Rice v. Clark County School District

Filing 47

ORDER Granting 40 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 32 MOTION to Amend Complaint. Defendant's Responses due by 6/14/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01709-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 06/01/17 Page 1 of 3 1 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 2 S. SCOTT GREENBERG, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4622 3 5100 W. Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 4 (702) 799-5373 Email: sgreenberg@interact.ccsd.net 5 Attorney for Defendant, CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01709-JCM-PAL 9 LESLIE RICE, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, (First Request) Defendant. 13 14 COME NOW, the parties, by and through their attorneys of 15 record, and hereby stipulate and agree to allow Defendant up to and 16 including Wednesday, June 14, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion 17 to File Amended Complaint (Docket No. 32) filed May 16, 2017. The 18 response is currently due May 31, 2017 and this is the first request 19 to extend time for the response. 20 On May 26th the parties filed a stipulation to extend the time st th 21 for Defendant’s response from May 31 to June 9 . Docket No. 37. 22 At the time filing that stipulation, defense counsel forgot that the th 23 District’s legal office is moving on June 9 . Defense counsel must th and the move, 24 have his office packed by the end of June 8 th 25 including computers, is to take place on June 9 and through the 26 weekend. This request to extend the time to the following th th 27 Wednesday, June 14 ,is to ensure with the office move of June 9 28 that defense counsel will be able to complete the opposition. With the filing of this stipulation, Docket No. 37 will be withdrawn. Case 2:16-cv-01709-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 06/01/17 Page 2 of 3 1 The following is the basis for the extension request set forth in 2 the parties previous stipulation in addition to the office move 3 discussed above. 4 The dispositive motion deadline is June 9, 2017. 5 31. In addition to the motion deadline in this matter and current Docket No. 6 motions Plaintiff recently filed that require responses, defense 7 counsel also has had summary judgment motions due in two (2) other 8 federal cases and a response to an OSHA employee retaliation 9 complaint and has an employee dismissal arbitration scheduled for 10 June 6th. This request for additional time is being made in good 11 faith based upon defense counsel’s schedule as noted herein (and May 12 29th is a holiday). Defendant will be filing a motion for summary 13 judgment and this request will have Defendant’s response to the 14 pending motion due the same time as the motion deadline as the 15 parties are filing stipulations with regard to the motion deadline 16 and other pending Plaintiff’s motion to re-open discovery so all 17 will be due June 14th. 18 Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully 19 requested that the time for Defendant’s response to Docket No. 32 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / -2- Case 2:16-cv-01709-JCM-PAL Document 40 Filed 06/01/17 Page 3 of 3 1 be extended up to and including June 14, 2017, given defense 2 counsel’s schedule and office move scheduled for June 9th described 3 above. DATED this 31st day of May, 2017. 4 5 6 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the General Counsel 7 8 By: DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 9 /s/ S. Scott Greenberg S. SCOTT GREENBERG Nevada Bar No. 4622 5100 W. Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 (702) 799-5373 Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 By:/s/ Cynthia L Alexander CYNTHIA L ALEXANDER Nevada Bar No. 6718 8363 W Sunset Rd, #200 Las Vegas, NV 89113 (702) 550-4422 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 16 Date: 17 June 7, 2017 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?