Jaquess v. US

Filing 47

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 23 Judge Ferenbach's report and recommendation is accepted and 29 plaintiff Larry Jaquess's objection is overruled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 30 plaintiff Larry Jaquess's motion to accept addendu ms is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Larry Jaquess must file a complaint on or before 1/6/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall seal 29 and 32 because they contain social security numbers. Plaintiff Larry Jaque ss is directed to comply with Local Rule IC 6-1 and not include personal-data identifiers such as social security numbers in publicly filed documents. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 LARRY JAQUESS, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 Case No. 2:16-cv-01710-APG-VCF v. US, 8 Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION TO ACCEPT ADDENDUMS (ECF Nos. 23, 29, 30) 9 10 On October 24, 2016, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach issued a report and recommendation 11 recommending that I dismiss this action for lack of an operative complaint. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff 12 Larry Jaquess filed an objection (ECF No. 29), but he did not file a complaint or explain why he 13 has not done so. Instead, he filed a motion for the court to accept addendums and then filed 14 sixteen addendums requesting money for dental work, food stamps, early retirement, a house, 15 recreation funds, clothing, a truck and RV, gas, insurance, and sleep pay, among other things. See 16 ECF Nos. 30-46. 17 I conducted a de novo review of the issues set forth in the report and recommendation. 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Judge Ferenbach sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the 19 decision. There is no operative complaint in this matter. Jaquess was given an opportunity to file 20 a complaint and failed to do so. Jaquess’s filings thus far have been voluminous, 21 incomprehensible, and, in some respects, delusional. Nevertheless, I will grant Jaquess a final 22 opportunity to file a proper complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), a 23 complaint must contain the following: (1) “a short and plain statement of the grounds for the 24 court’s jurisdiction,” (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing the plaintiff is entitled 25 to relief, and (3) “a demand for the relief sought.” Jaquess’s complaint must be complete in itself 26 without reference to any other filing. Additionally, he must sufficiently allege each claim and the 27 28 1 involvement of each defendant. Failure to file a complaint in response to this order will result in 2 dismissal of this case without prejudice. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Ferenbach’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) is accepted and plaintiff Larry Jaquess’s objection (ECF No. 29) is overruled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Larry Jaquess’s motion to accept addendums (ECF No. 30) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Larry Jaquess must file a complaint on or 8 before January 6, 2017. If he does so, the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons 9 on the complaint. The Court will issue a screening order on the complaint and address the 10 issuance of summons at the time, if applicable. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Failure to comply with 11 this order will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall seal ECF Nos. 29 and 32 13 because they contain social security numbers. Plaintiff Larry Jaquess is directed to comply with 14 Local Rule IC 6-1 and not include personal-data identifiers such as social security numbers in 15 publicly filed documents. 16 DATED this 6th day of December, 2016. 17 18 19 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?