Butensky v. FedEx Corporation
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 48 Motion to Extend Time Re: 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 2/16/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
WENDY BUTENSKY,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:16-CV-1718 JCM (VCF)
ORDER
v.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is plaintiff Wendy Butensky’s motion to extend time to file a
14
response to defendant Federal Express Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No.
15
48).
16
Plaintiff’s motion requests an extension until February 16, 2018 to respond to defendant’s
17
motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48). Plaintiff cites multiple mediations and trial
18
responsibilities in other cases in support of her request. Id. Plaintiff asserts that the requested
19
extension will not prejudice defendant. Id. Defendant has not filed a response to plaintiff’s
20
motion.
21
Plaintiff’s motion demonstrates good cause to support granting an extension of time to file
22
a response. An extension will further the judicial purpose of ensuring that the motion is decided
23
on the merits. See Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1258–59 (9th Cir. 2010).
24
Further, the motion was timely filed and defendant will not be prejudiced by an extension.
25
Good cause appearing,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 48) be,
27
and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until February 16, 2018 to file a response
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant will have 14 days from the date plaintiff
2
files a response to file a reply.
3
4
5
DATED February 2, 2018.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?