Butensky v. FedEx Corporation

Filing 78

ORDER Granting 77 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF Document 75 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 3

1

2
3
4

5

Craig E. Lindberg, Esq. (CA SBN 150778)
(Admitted Pro Hae Vice)
Jamie Chu, Esq. (NV SBN 10546)
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
2601 Main Street, Suite 340
Irvine, California 92614
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

7
8
9

10
11

Gregory H. King, Esq.
KING & DURHAM PLLC
6385 South Rainbow Blvd., Suite 220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

14
15

WENDY BUTENSKY, an individual,

16
17
18
19

Case No. 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF

Plaintiff,
v.

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation,

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS THE CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
[FRCP41(A)(l)]

Defendant.

20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FEDERAL EXPRESS

CORPORATION
2601 MAIN STREET
SUITE 340
IRVINE, CA 92614

(60-15939)
I
Case No. 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF Document 75 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 3

1

Plaintiff WENDY BUTENSKY ("Plaintiff'') and Defendant FEDERAL EXPRESS

2

CORPORATION ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and

3

agree as follows:

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant (the "Parties") have agreed to resolve the above-

5

captioned action, and based on their agreement (and compliance with that agreement), seek the

6

dismissal of this entire action with prejudice;

7

WHEREAS , the Parties agree that there is no prevailing party;

8

NOW, therefore, the Parties stipulate and agree to the dismissal with prejudice of this entire

9

action as to all parties and all claims for relief in Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of

1O

Civil Procedure 41 (a)(l)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own respective attorneys' fees and costs.

11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13

DATED: February 4, 2020

L EXPRESS CORPORATION

14
By: l.f---,--!~ -R-----,;c~-L.Jµ..i--e,..::~~~- --

15

---

Craig E.
Califor
Bar No. 150778 (Ad itted Pro Hae Vice)
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPO TION
2601 Main Street, Suite 340
Irvine, CA 92614

16
17
18

Attorneys for Defendant Federal Express C01poration

19
20

DATED: February 4, 2020

21
22
23
24
25

By:~~ - ~- - r----------i'---------l-- - - - Brandon Claus ernald
Nevada Bar No. 10582
6236 Laredo Street
Las Vegas, NV 89146

Attorneys for Wendy Butensky

26
27
28
FEDERAL EXPRESS

CORPORATION
260 1 MAIN STREET
SUITE340
IRVINE, CA 9261 4

(60-15939)
2
Case No. 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF Document 75 Filed 03/11/20 Page 3 of 3

1
2

(PROPOSED) ORDER
Having reviewed the Parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, IT IS

3

HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear

4

its own respective fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no further proceedings

5

shall take place in this action.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

8
9

March 12, _ _
DATED: _ _ _ _2020. _, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10

11
12

THE HONORABLE JAMES C. MAHAN

13
14
15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

24
25

26
27

28
FEDERAL EXPRESS

CORPORATION
2601 W.IN STREET

SUITE340
IRV!NE, CA 92614

(60-15939)
3
Case No. 2:16-cv-01718-JCM-VCF
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE