Beta Soft Systems, Inc. v. The Yosemite Group, LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation to File Surreply re 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Document 23 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 Harmeet K. Dhillon (CA Bar#: 207872) Pro Hac Vice Email: Harmeet@dhillonlaw.com Ravdeep S. Grewal(CA Bar#: 308447) Pro Hac Vice Email: Rgrewal@dhillonlaw.com DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 177 Post Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, California 94108 Tel: (415) 433-1700 Fax: (415) 520-6593 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PaulS. Padda, Esq. (NV Bar#: 10417) Email:psp@paulpaddalaw.com PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC 4240 West Flamingo Rd. Suite 220 Las Vegas, Nevada 89103 Tel: (702) 366-1888 Fax: (702) 366-1940 Web: www.paulpaddalaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Beta Soft Systems, Inc. d/b/a US It Solutions, Inc. Melissa Ingleby, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12935 LEAH MARTIN LAW 6671 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Ste. 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Tel: (702) 420-2733 Fax: (702) 330-3225 mingleby@leahmartinlv.com 19 20 Attorneys for Defendants The Yosemite Group, LLC Tell'ance Williams, and Angela Williams 21 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 23 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 24 25 26 27 BETA SOFT SYSTEMS, INC. a Califomia corporation d/b/a US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Case No: 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE SURREPLY v. 28 Stip1uation and [Proposed] Order to File Surreply Case No. 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Case 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Document 23 Filed 11/16/16 Page 2 of 3 1 2 THE YOSEMITE GROUP, LLC, a Wyoming company, TERRANCE WILLIAMS, an individual, ANGELA WILLIAMS, an individual. 3 4 5 6 7 Defendants. Pursuant to Local Rules IA6-2, and 7-1, and this Court's Standing Orders, the Parties hereby set forth the following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket 12. 8 On September 23,2016, Defendants Tenence and Angela Williams ("Defendants") filed a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket 12 (the "Motion"). On October 10, 2016, Plaintiff Beta Soft Systems, Inc. d/b/a US IT Solutions, Inc., ("Beta Soft") responded to the Motion, Docket 18 (the "Response"). On October 20,2016, Defendants replied to the response, Docket 19 (the "Reply"). Defendants' Reply included a "Supplemental Statement of Undisputed Material Facts." The Parties have discussed and agreed to stipulate to allowing Beta Soft to file a Surreply 16 to address the facts outlined in the Supplement Statement of Undisputed Material Facts portion of 17 the Reply. The Surreply is attached to this stipulation as "Exhibit A." 18 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Date: November ;4, 2016 21 (~) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. ORDER By: ~(J k,J:y (_)' 0 l-1 ยท~--1 Ravdeep S. Grewal, Esq. (CA SBN: 308447) J Pro Hac Vice It is so ordered. DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 17 Dated this ___ day of November, 2016. 177 Post Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: 415-433-1700 Email: rgrewal@dhillonlaw.com __________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Judge Stipluation and [Proposed] Order to File Surreply Attorney for Plaintiff 2 Case No. 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Case 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Document 23 Filed 11/16/16 Page 3 of 3 /~? 1 2 14.' 2016 LEAH MARTIN LAW Date: November I 3 4 By: 5 l"k)&~;;< ,fk&t4 ~r/ 1 Melissa Ingleby, Esq. ( Nevada Bar No. 12935 LEAH MARTIN LAW 6671 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Ste. 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Tel: (702) 420-2733 Fax: (702) 330-3225 mingleby@leahmartinlv.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED: 13 14 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipluation and [Proposed] Order to File Surreply Case No. 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?