Beta Soft Systems, Inc. v. The Yosemite Group, LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation to File Surreply re 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Document 23 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
Harmeet K. Dhillon (CA Bar#: 207872) Pro Hac Vice
Email: Harmeet@dhillonlaw.com
Ravdeep S. Grewal(CA Bar#: 308447) Pro Hac Vice
Email: Rgrewal@dhillonlaw.com
DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.
177 Post Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, California 94108
Tel: (415) 433-1700
Fax: (415) 520-6593
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
PaulS. Padda, Esq. (NV Bar#: 10417)
Email:psp@paulpaddalaw.com
PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC
4240 West Flamingo Rd. Suite 220
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Tel: (702) 366-1888
Fax: (702) 366-1940
Web: www.paulpaddalaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Beta Soft Systems, Inc.
d/b/a US It Solutions, Inc.
Melissa Ingleby, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12935
LEAH MARTIN LAW
6671 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Ste. 210
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Tel: (702) 420-2733
Fax: (702) 330-3225
mingleby@leahmartinlv.com
19
20
Attorneys for Defendants The Yosemite Group, LLC
Tell'ance Williams, and Angela Williams
21
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
23
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
24
25
26
27
BETA SOFT SYSTEMS, INC. a Califomia
corporation d/b/a US IT SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
Case No: 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO FILE SURREPLY
v.
28
Stip1uation and [Proposed] Order to File Surreply
Case No. 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF
Case 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Document 23 Filed 11/16/16 Page 2 of 3
1
2
THE YOSEMITE GROUP, LLC, a Wyoming
company, TERRANCE WILLIAMS, an
individual, ANGELA WILLIAMS, an
individual.
3
4
5
6
7
Defendants.
Pursuant to Local Rules IA6-2, and 7-1, and this Court's Standing Orders, the Parties
hereby set forth the following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket 12.
8
On September 23,2016, Defendants Tenence and Angela Williams ("Defendants") filed a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket 12 (the
"Motion"). On October 10, 2016, Plaintiff Beta Soft Systems, Inc. d/b/a US IT Solutions, Inc.,
("Beta Soft") responded to the Motion, Docket 18 (the "Response"). On October 20,2016,
Defendants replied to the response, Docket 19 (the "Reply"). Defendants' Reply included a
"Supplemental Statement of Undisputed Material Facts."
The Parties have discussed and agreed to stipulate to allowing Beta Soft to file a Surreply
16
to address the facts outlined in the Supplement Statement of Undisputed Material Facts portion of
17
the Reply. The Surreply is attached to this stipulation as "Exhibit A."
18
19
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Date: November
;4, 2016
21
(~)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.
ORDER
By:
~(J
k,J:y (_)'
0
l-1 ยท~--1
Ravdeep S. Grewal, Esq. (CA SBN: 308447) J
Pro Hac Vice
It is so ordered.
DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.
17
Dated this ___ day of November, 2016. 177 Post Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: 415-433-1700
Email: rgrewal@dhillonlaw.com
__________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
Stipluation and [Proposed] Order to File Surreply
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
Case No. 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF
Case 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF Document 23 Filed 11/16/16 Page 3 of 3
/~?
1
2
14.' 2016
LEAH MARTIN LAW
Date: November I
3
4
By:
5
l"k)&~;;< ,fk&t4 ~r/
1
Melissa Ingleby, Esq.
(
Nevada Bar No. 12935
LEAH MARTIN LAW
6671 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Ste. 210
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Tel: (702) 420-2733
Fax: (702) 330-3225
mingleby@leahmartinlv.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED:
13
14
15
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipluation and [Proposed] Order to File Surreply
Case No. 2:16-cv-01748-GMN-VCF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?