Luxenberg v. Clark County, Nevada ex. rel.

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 3/12/2017. Motions due by 4/11/2017. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/15/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Andrew L. Rempfer Nevada Bar No. 8628 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS 10091 Park Run Drive Ste 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145-8868 (702) 384-9900 (702) 384-5900 (fax) Andrew@SJPlawyer.com 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff STACY LUXENBERG 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 Case No. 2:16-cv-001762 STACY LUXENBERG, an individual, STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN and PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, ex. rel . CLARK COUNTY JUSTICE COURT., 13 Defendant. 14 / 15 16 1. MEETING: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LR 26-1(b), Andrew L. 17 Rempfer of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, counsel for Plaintiff STACY LUXENBERG and 18 Steven Wolfson and Scott Davis of CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, counsel CLARK 19 COUNTY, met on Tuesday, September 13, 2016 and discussed the merits and proposed 20 scheduling for this case, and the parties agree as follows: 21 2. INITIAL DISCLOSURES: The parties will exchange their initial disclosures in 22 accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) no later than Tuesday, September 27, 2016. The parties 23 expressly agree initial disclosures and all supplements thereto shall be bates-stamped with the 24 parties' respective identifying bates system. All documents identified by way of Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 26(a)(1) disclosures are to be produced in hard copy. Documents produced in electronic 26 format shall be produced again in hard copy if the receiving party is unable to read the 27 electronic format. To facilitate the speedy, and efficient exchange of discovery requests, each Law Offices of Steven J. Parsons 7201 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 108 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128-8354 (702)384-9900; fax (702)384-5900 Andrew@SJPlawyer.com Page 1 of 5 1 side agrees to send the responding party an electronic copy of any discovery request in MS 2 Word, WordPerfect, or .rtf, .txt format upon request. 3 3. A. 4 5 DISCOVERY PLAN: SUBJECTS OF DISCOVERY: Discovery may be conducted on all matters pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). B. 6 DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE: The plan is in general accordance with LR 7 26-2, and the parties request one hundred eighty (181) days to conduct percipient witness 8 discovery measured from September 13, 2016. The last proposed day of discovery of 9 percipient witnesses shall be Monday, March 12, 2017. C. 10 11 shall proceed according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) except that: i. The disclosure of experts and expert reports shall occur on Monday, 12 13 December 12, 2016, which is ninety (90) days before the discovery cut-off date.; ii. The disclosure of rebuttal experts shall occur on Wednesday, January 14 15 16 FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2) DISCLOSURES (EXPERTS): Disclosure of experts 11, 2016, which is thirty (30) days after the disclosure of experts. 4. AMENDMENT OF THE PLEADINGS AND ADDING PARTIES: The parties shall have 17 until Monday December 12, 2016, to file any motion to amend the pleadings or to add 18 parties. This is ninety (90) days before the discovery cut-off, which is in accordance with LR 19 26-1(b)(2). 20 5. INTERIM STATUS REPORTS: The parties shall file their interim status report 21 required by LR 26-3 by Wednesday, January 11, 2016, which is sixty (60) days before 22 discovery cut-off. 23 6. 24 25 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: The parties shall have until Tuesday April 11, 2017, to file dispositive motions, which is thirty (30) days after the close of discovery. 7. SETTLEMENT: The likelihood of settlement cannot be presently established. 26 27 Law Offices of Steven J. Parsons 7201 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 108 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128-8354 (702)384-9900; fax (702)384-5900 Andrew@SJPlawyer.com Page 2 of 5 1 8. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: The parties certify they have met and 2 conferred about using the alternative dispute resolution process pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(8). 3 This is an employment-related matter assigned to the Court’s Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”). 4 The parties will participate in the same once scheduled by the Court. Additional alternative 5 dispute resolution processes may be premature at this time. 6 9. ALTERNATIVE FORUMS FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION: The parties certify they 7 have met and considered a trial by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and the use of the Court’s Short Trial Program. At this time, the parties do 9 not consent to trial by the magistrate judge or the use of the Court’s Short Trial Program. 10 10. PRETRIAL ORDER: The pretrial order shall be filed Thursday May 11, 2017, 11 which is thirty (30) days after the date set for filing dispositive motions in this case. This 12 deadline is suspended if a dispositive motion is timely filed. 13 14 15 11. FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(3) DISCLOSURES: The disclosures required by this rule and any objections shall be included in the pretrial order. 12. ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION: The parties have discussed the 16 retention and production of electronic data. 17 reasonable, good faith, proportionate efforts as required under the Rules, including, without 18 limitation, Rule 26(g)(1)(B)(iii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to locate and produce 19 non-privileged documents that are responsive to discovery requests or subject to the 20 affirmative disclosure requirements of Rule 26(a). The parties agree that electronic documents 21 (such as e-mails) may be produced electronically or in hard copy. If the requesting party 22 specifically seeks production of electronic documents or other electronically stored information 23 in an electronic format, subject to any appropriate objections, the electronic documents or 24 electronically stored information which is produced shall be produced in the form in which it 25 is ordinarily maintained, or in another reasonably useable form or forms. Given the potential 26 scope and expense of responding to requests for electronically stored information, the parties 27 agree that they will meet and confer in good faith to ensure that the scope of any such request Law Offices of Steven J. Parsons 7201 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 108 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128-8354 (702)384-9900; fax (702)384-5900 Andrew@SJPlawyer.com Electronic Discovery: The parties will make Page 3 of 5 1 is proportionate to the prospective cost and expense that may be required to respond. The 2 parties agree that they will resolve any dispute regarding the disclosure of privileged material 3 or work product in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 502. The 4 parties agree that service of discovery via electronic means, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 5(b), is 5 sufficient, and the parties retain the right to receive three additional days for mailing provided 6 for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). The parties reserve the right to revisit this issue if a dispute or need 7 arises. 8 13. PROTECTION OF PRIVILEGED/TRIAL PREPARATION MATERIAL: If a party 9 discovers it has inadvertently disclosed privileged or trial preparation material, it agrees to 10 notify the opposing party in writing within 30 days of the discovery that such document(s) have 11 been disclosed, which written notification will set forth the basis for the claim that the items 12 disclosed are privileged or trial preparation material. If the party receiving the disclosure 13 agrees that the inadvertently-produced items are privileged or trial preparation material, it will 14 return all such items to the producing party without the retention of any copies. If the 15 receiving party disputes that the items are privileged or trial preparation materials, it will within 16 30 days of written notification of the inadvertent disclosure, present the disputed items 17 inadvertently disclosed to the court under seal for a decision with respect thereto (without the 18 retention of copies), including with such submission the producing party's written notification 19 and any statement the receiving party wishes to make in support of its position that the items 20 are not privileged or trial preparation material. 21 inadvertently-produced privileged or trial preparation materials before being notified of the 22 inadvertent disclosure, it will take reasonable steps to retrieve the materials pending resolution 23 of the matter. No inadvertent disclosure shall operate as a waiver to any claim that the 24 document(s) is privileged. 25 14. If the receiving party disclosed the The attorneys of record in this matter are registered for electronic filing with this 26 Court. Any documents electronically filed with this Court are deemed to be sufficiently served 27 on the other party as of the date that the document is electronically filed with the Court. Law Offices of Steven J. Parsons 7201 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 108 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128-8354 (702)384-9900; fax (702)384-5900 Andrew@SJPlawyer.com Page 4 of 5 1 15. LATER APPEARING PARTIES: A copy of this discovery plan and scheduling order 2 shall be served on any person served after it is entered or, if additional defendants should 3 appear, within five (5) days of their first appearance. This discovery plan and scheduling order 4 shall apply to such later appearing party, unless the Court, on motion and for good cause 5 shown, orders otherwise. 6 Dated: Wednesday, September 14, 2016. 7 LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 8 /s/ Andrew L. Rempfer ANDREW L. REMPFER Nevada Bar No. 8628 /s/ Scott Davis STEVEN B. WOLFSON Nevada Bar No. 1565 SCOTT DAVIS Nevada Bar No. 10019 9 10 Attorney for Plaintiff STACY LUXENBERG 11 Attorney for Defendant CLARK COUNTY 12 13 SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LR 26-1(b). 14 ORDER 15 16 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 Dated this ___ day of September, 2016. September 15, 2016 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Law Offices of Steven J. Parsons 7201 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 108 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128-8354 (702)384-9900; fax (702)384-5900 Andrew@SJPlawyer.com Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?