US Bank National Associationv. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Parties to Certify Cases to Nevada Attorney General. Proof of compliance due within 10 days. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/4/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
IN RE HOA FORECLOSURE CASES.
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO
CERTIFY CASES TO NEVADA
ATTORNEY GENERAL
5
6
7
The following cases involve a constitutional challenge to Nevada state statutes, specifically
8
Chapter 116:
9
Bank of America, N.A. v. Spring Mountain Ranch Master Ass’n, 2:16-cv-01330-APG-NJK
10
Ditech Financial LLC v Sunrise Mountain Townhomes Ass’n, 2:16-cv-01415-APG-GWF
11
Bank of America, N.A. v. Operture Inc., 2:16-cv-01692-APG-GWF
12
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:16-cv-01697-APG-NJK
13
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Copper Sands Homeowners Ass’n, 2:16-cv-01720-APG-NJK
14
US Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:16-cv-01776-APG-NJK
15
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Copperfield Homeowners Ass’n, 2:16-cv-01834-APG-VCF.
16
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1(a), the party challenging the statute’s
17
constitutionality should have served the Nevada Attorney General with its complaint, motion, or
18
other filing that calls into question Chapter 116’s constitutionality. I order the parties in these cases
19
to follow that Rule and to file proof of compliance within 10 days of the date of this order.
20
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the party challenging Chapter 116’s
21
constitutionality in each of these cases must serve the Nevada Attorney General with the complaint,
22
motion, or other filing that calls into question Chapter 116’s constitutionality, and shall file proof
23
of compliance within 10 days of the date of this order.
24
DATED this 4th day of August, 2016.
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?