Cave v. JPM Chase Bank Investments Division et al
Filing
33
ORDER that 25 Plaintiff's Petition to Enter R-903; 901(4-6) and 902, Self- Authenticating Repudiating Evidence Just in Case, onto this Courts Docket and Records is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
JPM CHASE BANK INVESTMENTS
DIVISION, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
CHRIS HAROLD CAVE,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01806-RFB-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition to Enter R-903; 901(4-6) and 902, Self-
13
Authenticating Repudiating Evidence Just in Case, onto this Court’s Docket and Records (ECF No. 25),
14
filed on October 18, 2016. Defendant filed its Response (ECF No. 31) on November 4, 2016.
15
Although Courts broadly construe pleadings filed by pro se litigants, even pro se litigants must
16
comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t., 901 F.2d
17
696, 699 (9th Cir.1990); see also Carter v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 784 F.2d 1006, 1008 (9th Cir.
18
1986). Pro se litigants are not treated more favorably than parties with attorneys of record and are
19
expected to abide by the rules of the court in which litigation proceeds. Carter, 784 F.2d at 1008.
20
Pleadings by pro se litigants, regardless of deficiencies, should only be judged by function, not form.
21
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 521 (1972).
22
Even broadly construed, Plaintiff’s motion fails procedurally and is not coherent. To the
23
extent that Plaintiff intends to give notice to the opposing parties that he may use the documents
24
attached to his motion as evidence, then he need only serve on Defendants a disclosure of such evidence
25
pursuant to Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. He should not file such documents with
26
the Court. To the extent that Plaintiff is requesting that the Court hold that these documents are
27
admissible in evidence at trial, Plaintiff should file an appropriate motion in limine so stating.
28
Accordingly,
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Petition to Enter R-903; 901(4-6) and 902, Self-
2
Authenticating Repudiating Evidence Just in Case, onto this Court’s Docket and Records (ECF No. 25)
3
is denied.
4
DATED this 7th day of November, 2016.
5
6
7
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?