Baas v. State of Nevada Department of Health & Human Services Division of Welfare & Supportive Services Child Support Enforcement Program
Filing
28
ORDER that 9 State of Nevada, Division of Welfare and Supportive Services of the Department of Health and Human Services' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Linda Baas shall file an amended complaint on or before March 8, 2017 if sufficient facts exist to allow her to properly assert claims. Failure to file an amended complaint by that date will result in dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
LINDA BAAS,
5
6
7
8
9
Case No. 2:16-cv-01821-APG-GWF
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEVADA DIVISION OF
WELFARE AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES
OF THe DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
(ECF No. 9)
Defendant.
10
11
12
Plaintiff Linda Baas filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act for disability
13
discrimination and retaliation against defendant State of Nevada, Division of Welfare and
14
Supportive Services of the Department of Health and Human Services. ECF No. 1. The
15
defendant moves to dismiss on the basis of Eleventh Amendment immunity. ECF No. 9. In
16
response, Baas concedes her claims are barred. ECF No. 26. However, she requests leave to
17
amend. Id.
18
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant State of Nevada, Division of Welfare and
19
Supportive Services of the Department of Health and Human Services’ motion to dismiss (ECF
20
No. 9) is GRANTED.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Linda Baas shall file an amended complaint on
22
or before March 8, 2017 if sufficient facts exist to allow her to properly assert claims. Failure to
23
file an amended complaint by that date will result in dismissal without prejudice.
24
DATED this 1st day of February, 2017.
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?