Henderson v. Hughes et al

Filing 126

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 111 Defendants' motion for leave to appear specially is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

ELMA HENDERSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
THOMAS ROBERT HUGHES, et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:16-cv-01837-JAD-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for leave to appear specially (ECF No.

11

111), filed on February 24, 2017. Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 112) on February 24, 2017, and

12

Defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 121) on March 3, 2017.

13

Defendants move for leave to appear specially for the purposes of contesting service.

14

However, Defendants have already attempted to quash service in this matter (ECF Nos. 55, 58, 62

15

and 64). The Court considered Defendants’ arguments and denied the motions (ECF No. 90). The

16

Court has already ruled that service on Defendants was appropriate. Defendants do not provide any

17

new evidence to suggest a reconsideration of this order is warranted.

18
19
20

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for leave to appear specially (ECF
No. 111) is DENIED.
DATED: March 8, 2017.

21
22

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1