Henderson v. Hughes et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 111 Defendants' motion for leave to appear specially is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
THOMAS ROBERT HUGHES, et al,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01837-JAD-CWH
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for leave to appear specially (ECF No.
111), filed on February 24, 2017. Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 112) on February 24, 2017, and
Defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 121) on March 3, 2017.
Defendants move for leave to appear specially for the purposes of contesting service.
However, Defendants have already attempted to quash service in this matter (ECF Nos. 55, 58, 62
and 64). The Court considered Defendants’ arguments and denied the motions (ECF No. 90). The
Court has already ruled that service on Defendants was appropriate. Defendants do not provide any
new evidence to suggest a reconsideration of this order is warranted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for leave to appear specially (ECF
No. 111) is DENIED.
DATED: March 8, 2017.
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?