Henderson v. Hughes et al
Filing
38
ORDER re 29 Order on Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically. By 10/31/2016, Defendant must file a written certification that he has completed the CM/ECF tutorial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/30/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
ELMA HENDERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CHERYL BETH HUGHES, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01837-JAD-CWH
ORDER
12
13
On September 21, 2016, this court issued an order (ECF No. 29) granting Defendant
14
Thomas Hughes permission to file electronically in this matter, on his own behalf. The court now
15
supplements that order with the following instructions.
16
//
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to this court’s order (ECF No. 29) granting permission to
2
Defendant Thomas Hughes to file electronically in this matter, Defendant must comply with the
3
following procedures to activate his CM/ECF account:
4
(1) By October 31, 2016, Defendant must file a written certification that he has completed
5
the CM/ECF tutorial and is familiar with Electronic Filing Procedures, Best Practices, and the Civil
6
& Criminal Events Menu that are available on the court’s website, www.nvd.uscourts.gov.
7
Defendant is advised that he is not authorized to file electronically unless this certification is filed
8
with the court within the time frame specified.
9
10
(2) After timely filing the certification, Defendant must contact the CM/ECF Help Desk at
(702) 464-5555 to set up a CM/ECF account.
11
12
DATED: September 30, 2016
13
14
15
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?