Henderson v. Hughes et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 27 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

ELMA HENDERSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
THOMAS ROBERT HUGHES, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:16-cv-01837-JAD-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the court is pro se Defendant Thomas Robert Hughes’ motion (ECF No. 27)

11

to reconsider, filed on September 19, 2016. Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 28) on September

12

21, 2016, and Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 44) on October 5, 2016.

13

Defendant requests that the court reconsider its order (ECF No. 13), filed on September 12,

14

2016, denying Defendant’s motion to clarify. However, Defendant’s motion does not provide a basis

15

for reconsideration. The original order was denied, without prejudice, for failure to cite any points

16

and authorities, as required by Local Rule 7-2(a). Defendant does not show that his original motion

17

was in fact supported by any authority. After curing this defect, Defendant is free to file a renewed

18

motion, but the court’s ruling on the original motion stands.

19
20

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 27) to reconsider is
DENIED.

21
22

DATED: October 18, 2016.

23
24

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27
28

1