Henderson v. Hughes et al
Filing
68
ORDER denying 61 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/8/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ELMA HENDERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
THOMAS ROBERT HUGHES, et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
Case No. 2:16-cv-01837-JAD-CWH
ORDER
10
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (ECF
11
No. 61), filed on November 7, 2016. Upon review, the parties have not agreed on a discovery plan.
12
In the interest of judicial economy, the court will require the parties to meet and confer and file a
13
revised discovery plan and scheduling order.
14
15
16
17
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan and scheduling
order (ECF No. 61) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties meet and confer and file a revised discovery
plan and scheduling order no later than November 21, 2016.
18
19
DATED: November 8, 2016.
20
21
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?