Williams v. Nevens et al
Filing
22
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 15 this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 15 respondents' motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
10
11
12
CHRISTOPHER B. WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
D.W. NEVEN, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
Case No. 2:16-cv-01843-APG-NJK
Christopher B. Williams filed this pro se habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
15
Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition (ECF No. 15), and Williams did not
16
file an opposition. The Nevada Department of Corrections website reflects that Williams
17
has been paroled. Williams, however, has failed to comply with Local Rule IA 3-1,
18
which requires an attorney or pro se party to immediately file a notice of change of
19
mailing address with the court.
20
Accordingly, on February 2, 2018, this court issued an order directing Williams to
21
file and serve a notice of change of address within fourteen days. Petitioner was
22
expressly advised that failure to comply with that order could result in the dismissal of
23
the petition.
24
The order was served on Williams at his address of record via U.S. mail (see
25
ECF No. 19). On February 12, 2018, the order was returned as undeliverable, bearing
26
the notation “Not at [High Desert State Prison]; no new address” (ECF No. 21). Thus,
27
this action shall be dismissed for failure to comply with LR IA 3-1.
28
1
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED as set forth in this
order.
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is
DENIED as moot.
5
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment and close this
case.
7
8
DATED: 27 February 2018.
9
10
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?