Ditech Financial, LLC v. SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 17 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff has until 1/22/17, to present to the Clerk of Court $500.00 in lawful money as security in compliance with NRS 18.130(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the CLERK OF COURT is directed to accept the deposit of $500.00 from plaintiff under NRS 18.130 as security for costs and charges that may be awarded against this plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Ditech Financial, LLC,
5
Plaintiff
2:16-cv-01880-JAD-GWF
Order Directing Clerk of Court to Accept
Security of Costs Under NRS 18.130
6
v.
7
SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC, et al,
8
[ECF No. 17]
Defendants
9
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC demanded that Plaintiff Ditech Financial, LLC, an out-of-
10
11
state resident, post a cost bond under NRS 18.130(1).1 Ditech has indicated its intent to comply.2
12
Because a court order is required in this district for the Clerk of Court to permit the posting of a
13
cost bond, the demand is tracked as a motion in the court’s system. Accordingly, with good
14
cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SFR’s Demand for Security of Costs [ECF No.
15
17] is GRANTED; plaintiff has until January 22, 2017, to present to the Clerk of Court
16
$500.00 in lawful money as security in compliance with NRS 18.130(1). IT IS FURTHER
17
ORDERED that the CLERK OF COURT is directed to accept the deposit of $500.00 from
18
plaintiff under NRS 18.130 as security for costs and charges that may be awarded against this
19
plaintiff.
DATED: January 12, 2017
20
________________________________
_______________________
_
_
_
_
Jennifer A. Dorsey
nnifer A
fer
fe
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ECF No. 17.
2
ECF No. 19.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?