Goldberger v. SmartCare OS, LLC et al

Filing 54

ORDER granting ECF No. 52 Motion to Seal. The exhibit at Docket No. 50 -3 shall remain redacted. The filing at Docket No. 51 shall remain under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 ANDREW GOLDBERGER, 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 SMARTCAREOS, LLC, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-01884-RFB-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 52) 16 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to seal. Docket No. 52. Defendants submit that 17 certain portions of the exhibit at Docket No. 50-3 should be redacted to maintain the confidentiality of 18 settlement information. Id at 3. Defendants’ exhibit includes a statement of the settlement amount and 19 other financial information related to the settlement. Docket No. 51-3 at 3. In compliance with the 20 Court’s Local Rules, Defendants filed an unredacted version of the exhibit under seal. Docket No. 51. 21 Parties “who seek to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must 22 meet the high threshold of showing that ‘compelling reasons’ support secrecy.” Kamakana v. City & 23 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). Those compelling reasons must outweigh 24 the competing interests of the public in having access to the judicial records and understanding the 25 judicial process. Id. at 1178-79. In this case, the Court finds that compelling reasons exist to support 26 the requested redactions. 27 // 28 // 1 Accordingly, the motion to seal is GRANTED. Docket No. 52. The exhibit at Docket No. 50-3 shall 2 remain redacted. The filing at Docket No. 51 shall remain under seal. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: March 12, 2018 5 6 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?