Johnson v. Garofalo et al

Filing 176

ORDER Re: NDOC Defendants' 174 Motion for Clarification and 175 Status Report. The settlement conference will go forward at 10:00 AM on 1/17/2020. The Attorney General's Office will arrange for the transportation of Plaintiff to and from the settlement conference. (see Order for details re: attendance). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON, 6 Plaintiff, 2:16-cv-01889-GMN-VCF ORDER 7 8 vs. GAROFALO, et al., 9 10 11 Defendants. Before the court are NDOC Defendants’ Motion for Clarification (ECF NO. 174) and Status Report (ECF NO. 175). 12 Accordingly, 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the settlement conference will go forward at 10:00 AM, January 14 15 16 17, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General's Office will arrange for the transportation of Plaintiff to and from the settlement conference. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following must attend the settlement conference: 18 1. Lausteveion Johnson – Plaintiff; 19 2. Travis Barrick, Esq. – counsel for Plaintiff in case 2:16-cv-01889-GMN-GWF; 20 3. Renee Cooper, Esq. – counsel for Plaintiff in case 2:15-cv-00884-JAD-NJK (if Ms. Cooper is 21 not able to attend, Mr. Barrick must have settlement authority in case number 2:15-cv-00884-JAD-NJK.); 22 4. DAG Matthew Feeley – counsel for “NDOC Defendants”; 23 5. DAG Adam Honey – counsel for “Parole Board Defendants”; 24 6. Nancy Katafias – Nevada State Tort Claims Manager; 25 7. Associate Warden Monique Hubbard-Pickett – NDOC Representative; 1 8. Christopher DeRicco – Parole Board Chairman. 2 DATED this 14th day of January, 2020. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?