Baskim Holdings, Inc. v. Two M, Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER Granting 35 Motion to Extend Time re 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc. shall have until 4/27/17 to respond to defendant Two M, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

BASKIM HOLDINGS, INC.,

5

Plaintiff,

6

v.

7

TWO M, INC.,

8

Case No. 2:16-cv-01898-APG-GWF
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
(ECF NO. 35)

Defendant.

9
10

Plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc. moves to extend the time to respond to defendant Two M,

11

Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. Two M did not oppose that motion. I therefore grant it

12

under Local Rule 7-2(d). Moreover, Baskim has shown that it needs further discovery to respond

13

to Two M’s motion. Specifically, Baskim has shown it must take further discovery to obtain

14

evidence about Two M’s claimed use of the trademark in relation to Two M’s asserted defenses.

15

See ECF No. 35 and attached exhibits; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).

16

IT IS TEHREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc.’s motion to extend

17

time (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc. shall have until April 27,

18

2017 to respond to defendant Two M, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment.

19

DATED this 31st day of March, 2017.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE