Baskim Holdings, Inc. v. Two M, Inc.
ORDER Granting 35 Motion to Extend Time re 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc. shall have until 4/27/17 to respond to defendant Two M, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
BASKIM HOLDINGS, INC.,
TWO M, INC.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01898-APG-GWF
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
(ECF NO. 35)
Plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc. moves to extend the time to respond to defendant Two M,
Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. Two M did not oppose that motion. I therefore grant it
under Local Rule 7-2(d). Moreover, Baskim has shown that it needs further discovery to respond
to Two M’s motion. Specifically, Baskim has shown it must take further discovery to obtain
evidence about Two M’s claimed use of the trademark in relation to Two M’s asserted defenses.
See ECF No. 35 and attached exhibits; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).
IT IS TEHREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc.’s motion to extend
time (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Baskim Holdings, Inc. shall have until April 27,
2017 to respond to defendant Two M, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment.
DATED this 31st day of March, 2017.
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?