Baskim Holdings, Inc. v. Two M, Inc.
Filing
96
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 94 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
BASKIM HOLDINGS, INC.,
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TWO M, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01898-APG-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under
Seal (ECF No. 94), filed on September 22, 2017.
Plaintiff requests leave to file unredacted exhibits attached to Defendants’ third motion for
14
summary judgment under seal and for Defendants to file a redacted version of the exhibits in the
15
public record. Plaintiff represents that the exhibits are a licensing agreement and a nunc pro tunc
16
agreement that contain proprietary trade secret information such as pricing terms, royalty rates, and
17
guaranteed minimum payment terms. To justify sealing documents attached to dispositive motions,
18
a party is required to present articulable facts identifying the interests favoring continuing secrecy
19
and show that these specific interests overcome the presumption of public access by outweighing
20
the public’s interests in understanding the judicial process. Kamakana v. City and County of
21
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1181 (9th Cir. 2006). The Court finds that Plaintiff has met its burden
22
here and grants leave to file the unredacted exhibits under seal. Defendants shall filed a redacted
23
version on the public record. Accordingly,
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under
Seal (ECF No. 94) is granted.
DATED this 26th day of September, 2017.
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?