Centex Homes v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company et al
Filing
56
ORDER Granting 55 Stipulation for Extension of Time. IT IS SO ORDERED: Defendant and Cross-defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company's response to Everest National Insurance Company's Cross-claim is due 14 days after entr y of the Court's order ruling on St. Paul's pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Centex's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
RAMIRO MORALES, # 007101
rmorales@mfrlegal.com
MORALES FIERRO & REEVES
600 Tonopah Drive, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Telephone: (702) 699-7822
Facsimile: (702) 699-9455
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-defendant
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01958-JAD-VCF
CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general
partnership,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE )
COMPANY, a New York corporation;
)
EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE
)
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
)
INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY
)
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation;
)
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a )
Delaware corporation; FEDERAL
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana
)
corporation; and UNDERWRITERS AT
)
LLOYDS LONDON, an England corporation; )
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut
)
corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO
EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY’S CROSS-CLAIM
(First Request)
23
24
Defendant and Cross-defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”), by and
25
through its counsel of record, Ramiro Morales, of the Law Offices of Morales Fierro & Reeves, and
26
Defendant, Counterclaimant and Cross-claimant Everest National Insurance Company (“Everest”), by and
27
through its counsel of record, Theodore J. Kurtz, of Selman Breitman LLP, hereby stipulate to extend the
28
deadline for St. Paul’s filing of a response to Everest’s Cross-claim. Currently pending before the Court is
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO: 2:16-cv-01958-JAD-VCF
1
St. Paul’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Centex’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In light of
2
St. Paul’s pending Motion to Dismiss, Everest and St. Paul hereby stipulate and agree that St. Paul’s time to
3
respond to Everest’s complaint shall be extended such that St. Paul’s response to Everest’s cross-claim will
4
be due 14 days from the date of entry of the Court’s order ruling on St. Paul’s Motion to Dismiss.
5
6
This is the first stipulation for the extension of Federal’s time to respond to Everest’s Cross-claim.
DATED: January 30, 2017
MORALES FIERRO & REEVES
7
8
By
/s/ Ramiro Morales
Ramiro Morales (NV Bar No. 7101)
600 South Tonopah Drive, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Telephone: (702) 699-7822
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-defendant
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE
COMPANY
12
13
14
DATED: January 30, 2017
SELMAN BREITMAN LLP
15
By:
16
/s/ Theodore J. Kurtz
Theodore J. Kurtz (NV Bar No. 1344)
3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 430-5902
17
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant and Crossclaimant EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
20
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED: Defendant and Cross-defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance
24
Company’s response to Everest National Insurance Company’s Cross-claim is due 14 days after entry of the
25
Court’s order ruling on St. Paul’s pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Centex’s complaint for lack of subject
26
matter jurisdiction.
27
1-31-2017
Dated: __________________________
_____________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO: 2:16-cv-01958-JAD-VCF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?