James v. City of Las Vegas et al
Filing
52
ORDER Granting Petitioner's #51 Motion for Disbursement of Blocked Trust Account. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JANE DOE a minor, by and through her
natural parent,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, a political subdivision )
of the State of Nevada; ASHLEY
)
FERNANDEZ, individually; CINDY MOYES, )
individually; and ANDRES ANZALONE,
)
individually,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01979-GMN-VCF
ORDER
12
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Disbursement of Blocked Trust Account,
13
14
(ECF No. 51), filed by Petitioner Catrina James (“Petitioner”). For the reasons discussed
15
below, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s Motion.
16
I.
BACKGROUND
17
This case was originally filed on August 19, 2016. (Compl., ECF No. 1). On May 16,
18
2017, Petitioner filed the Motion for Disbursement of Blocked Trust Account, (ECF No. 51).
19
No defendant filed a response, and the deadline to do so has passed.
20
II.
DISCUSSION
Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that “[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and
21
22
authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for
23
attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” D. Nev. R. 7-2(d). Given
24
the defendants’ failure to file an opposition, the Court grants the Motion pursuant to Local Rule
25
7-2(d).
Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
III.
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Disbursement of Blocked
Trust Account, (ECF No. 51), is GRANTED.
4
5
10
DATED this _____ day of October, 2017.
6
7
8
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?