Smith v. Nye County Detention Center

Filing 16

ORDER that Plaintiff shall file a notice with the court disclosing all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case no later than 12/12/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 KRAIG SMITH, 8 9 Case No. 2:16-cv-01999-RFB-PAL Plaintiff, v. 10 NYE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al. 11 ORDER Defendants. 12 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate of Interested Parties 13 as required by LR 7.1-1. On September 26, 2017, a screening order was entered and Smith’s 14 Complaint (ECF No. 14) was filed. No answer has been filed. Canon 3C(1)(c) of the Code of 15 Conduct for United States Judges and 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4) require the court to screen cases for 16 financial disqualification or other financial matters that may call for a judge’s recusal 17 (disqualification). 18 private non-governmental parties must identify in the disclosure statement all persons, associations 19 of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, 20 pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case.” 21 22 LR 7.1-1(a) states, in pertinent part, that “pro se parties and attorneys for The disclosure statement must include the following certification: 24 The undersigned, pro se party, certifies that the following may have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case: (here list the names of all such parties and identify their connection and interests.) These representations are made to enable judges of the court to evaluate possible disqualifications or recusal. 25 Signature of pro se party. 23 26 27 Smith must file a notice with the court disclosing all persons, associations of persons, 28 firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, pecuniary 1     1 interest in the outcome of the case. If there are no known interested parties other than those 2 participating in the case, “a statement to that effect will satisfy the rule.” LR 7.1-1(b). 3 Additionally, Smith must promptly file a supplemental notice “upon any change in the information 4 that this rule requires.” LR 7.1-1(c). 5 Accordingly, 6 IT IS ORDERED that Smith shall file a notice with the court disclosing all persons, 7 associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that 8 have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case no later than December 12, 2017. 9 Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not 10 11 be imposed. DATED this 28th day of November, 2017. 12 13 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?