Smith v. Nye County Detention Center
Filing
16
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file a notice with the court disclosing all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case no later than 12/12/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
KRAIG SMITH,
8
9
Case No. 2:16-cv-01999-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff,
v.
10
NYE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et
al.
11
ORDER
Defendants.
12
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate of Interested Parties
13
as required by LR 7.1-1. On September 26, 2017, a screening order was entered and Smith’s
14
Complaint (ECF No. 14) was filed. No answer has been filed. Canon 3C(1)(c) of the Code of
15
Conduct for United States Judges and 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4) require the court to screen cases for
16
financial disqualification or other financial matters that may call for a judge’s recusal
17
(disqualification).
18
private non-governmental parties must identify in the disclosure statement all persons, associations
19
of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct,
20
pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case.”
21
22
LR 7.1-1(a) states, in pertinent part, that “pro se parties and attorneys for
The disclosure statement must include the following certification:
24
The undersigned, pro se party, certifies that the following may have
a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case: (here list the
names of all such parties and identify their connection and interests.)
These representations are made to enable judges of the court to
evaluate possible disqualifications or recusal.
25
Signature of pro se party.
23
26
27
Smith must file a notice with the court disclosing all persons, associations of persons,
28
firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, pecuniary
1
1
interest in the outcome of the case. If there are no known interested parties other than those
2
participating in the case, “a statement to that effect will satisfy the rule.” LR 7.1-1(b).
3
Additionally, Smith must promptly file a supplemental notice “upon any change in the information
4
that this rule requires.” LR 7.1-1(c).
5
Accordingly,
6
IT IS ORDERED that Smith shall file a notice with the court disclosing all persons,
7
associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that
8
have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case no later than December 12, 2017.
9
Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not
10
11
be imposed.
DATED this 28th day of November, 2017.
12
13
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?