Hurd et al v. Clark County School District et al
Filing
110
ORDER granting 109 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order. Motions due by 6/22/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 109 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MARIANNE C. LANUTI, SBN 007784
Law Offices of Marianne C. Lanuti
194 Inveraray Court
Henderson, NV 89074
Tel: 702.501-1147
Fax: 702.270-2346
Nvkidslaw@gmail.com
TODD BOLEY, CA Bar No. 68119
Law Offices of Todd Boley
2831 Mariner Square Dr., Ste 280
Alameda, CA 94501
Tel: (510) 836-4500
Fax: (510) 649-5170
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MARK E. FERRARIO, SBN 1625
KARA B. HENDRICKS, SBN 7743
WHITNEY L. WELCH, SBN 12129
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400
North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Tel: (702) 792-3773
Fax: (702) 792-9002
ferrariom@gtlaw.com
hendricksk@gtlaw.com
welchw@gtlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants Clark County
School District,
Shawn Paquette and Kristy Keller
PETER W. ALFERT, CA Bar No. 83139
LAW OFFICE OF PETER ALFERT,
P.C.
200 Pringle Ave., Suite 450
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel: (925) 279-3009
Fax: (925) 279-3342
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
TREVOR J. HATFIELD, SBN 7373
HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD
703 S. 8th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Tel: (702) 388-4469
Fax: (702) 386-9825
THatfield@HatfieldLawAssociates.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant James P. Doran
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
19
20
21
22
23
BROOK M. HURD, GERALDINE C. HURD,
AND M.H., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH
HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, BROOK M.
HURD; LUIS O. VILLALOBOS; OLIVIA N.
ESPINOZA; AND L.M.V., A MINOR, BY AND
THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM
OLIVIA N. ESPINOZA;
Plaintiffs,
24
25
26
v.
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
JAMES P. DORAN, SHAWN PAQUETTE,
AND KRISTY KELLER
27
Defendants.
28
PROPOSED STIPULATION
LV 421031861v1
Case No. 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-NJK
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY THE
SCHEDULING ORDER
[THIRD REQUEST]
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 109 Filed 03/02/18 Page 2 of 6
1
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-entitled action
that:
3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF THE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES
4
AS DESCRIBED BELOW:
5
Written Discovery:
6
This stipulation does not extend any deadlines as to written discovery.
7
30(b)(6) Witness Deposition Discovery:
8
This stipulation requests a brief extension of the current deadline to complete 30(b)(6)
9
witness depositions only, until March 19, 2018.
10
Expert Discovery:
11
This stipulation requests an extension of the current deadline to complete expert
12
discovery, until April 30, 2018.
EXPLANATION:
13
14
30(b)(6) Depositions:
15
On January 30, 2018 this Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’ request to take
s
16
additional lay depositions, denying in part and granting in part Defendants’motion for a
17
protective order to limiting the 30(b)(6) depositions previously noticed by Plaintiffs, and
18
extending the deadline to complete lay witness depositions until March 1, 2018. The parties have
19
diligently worked to complete the depositions within the allotted time. All lay witness
20
depositions have been completed by the current deadline. However, the Defendants were unable
21
to schedule the depositions of all the 30(b)(6) witnesses within the allotted time due to
22
unavoidable conflicts. The parties agree that failure to schedule the depositions of these
23
witnesses prior to cut-off was not due to a lack of diligence by any party.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-1PROPOSED STIPULATION
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 109 Filed 03/02/18 Page 3 of 6
1
Expert Discovery:
2
Plaintiffs’disclosed experts with reports on December 15, 2017. Defendants’each
3
disclosed rebuttal experts, with reports, on January 22, 2018. The parties have completed
4
extensive additional depositions subsequent to the initial expert designation deadline.
5
Specifically, nineteen depositions were taken by the parties in the time between the expert report
6
deadline for initial reports and the current date and an additional seven 30(b)(6) deposition
7
categories are scheduled. Plaintiffs assert that the testimony taken at these depositions is
8
relevant to the opinions expressed by the experts in their expert reports. As such, Plaintiffs
9
intend to supplement the expert reports to reflect the additional testimony and any additional
10
opinions (if any) the expert may have formed after reviewing the testimony. Defendants reserve
11
the right to file supplemental reports after receipt of Plaintiffs’supplements if deemed necessary.
12
The parties request that the Court allow a brief extension of the expert discovery deadline
13
which will provide Plaintiffs’experts the opportunity to review the completed deposition
14
transcripts of the depositions taken subsequent to the drafting of the initial reports and, if
15
necessary, to prepare supplement reports reflecting this new information. This extension will
16
also provide Defendants’rebuttal experts an opportunity to review the supplemental reports and
17
in turn supplement their own reports if necessary. Finally, the extension will facilitate the
18
orderly and economical taking of expert depositions. The parties have agreed to hold off on
19
taking any expert depositions until after the supplemental reports are produced in order to avoid
20
the unnecessary expense of potentially needing to depose the same experts on multiple
21
occasions.
22
Current Deposition Schedule Status is as follows:
23
2/26/18
Deposition of Kristy Keller was completed
24
2/27/18
30(b)(6) deposition of Cathy Scott, re 16 30(b)(6) categories completed
25
2/27/18
Deposition of Amy Dinkleman was completed
26
2/28/18
Continued deposition of Michael Hollis was completed
27
2/28/18
30(b)(6) deposition of Meg Nigro, re 4 categories completed
28
3/01/18
30(b)(6) deposition of John Schleifer, re 1 category (deposition designated in
-2-
PROPOSED STIPULATION
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 109 Filed 03/02/18 Page 4 of 6
1
2
lieu of deposition)
3/01/18
3
4
30(b)(6) deposition of Shawn Paquette, re 7 categories (deposition designated
in lieu of deposition for 2 additional categories)
3/01/18
5
30(b)(6) deposition of Cesar Zuluaga re 1 category (rescheduled at Plaintiffs’
request)
6
3/09/18
30(b)(6) deposition of Okazaki, re 4 categories
7
TBD
30(b)(6) deposition Designee re Category 32
8
TBD
30(b)(6) deposition of Designee re Category 53
PROPOSED NEW DEADLINES
9
10
11
12
Based on the foregoing, the parties request a modification of the discovery deadlines as to
lay depositions only as follows:
1. Current Deadlines:
13
L/D to Complete Fact Witness Depositions:
March 1, 2018
14
Expert Discovery cut-off date:
March 31, 2018
15
Dispositive motion deadline:
April 13, 2018
16
Proposed joint pretrial order
May 14, 2018 or 30 days
after the Court rules on any
dispositive motions.
17
18
2. Proposed Deadlines:
19
L/D to Complete 30(b)(6) Witness Depositions:
March 19, 2018
20
Supplemental Expert Reports
(for Plaintiffs designated experts):
April 13, 2018
Supplemental Rebuttal Expert Report
(for Defendants’designated Rebuttal Reports):
April 27, 2018
Completion of Expert Depositions:
May 25, 2018
Dispositive motion deadline:
June 22, 2018
Proposed joint pretrial order:
The later of July 27, 2018
or 30 days after the Court
rules on any dispositive
motions.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3PROPOSED STIPULATION
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 109 Filed 03/02/18 Page 5 of 6
1
2
Date: March 2, 2018
3
By: s/ Ian A. Hansen
PETER W. ALFERT
IAN A. HANSEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
4
5
6
LAW OFFICES OF PETER W. ALFERT
Date: March 2, 2018
7
LAW OFFICES OF MARIANNE C. LANUTI
By: s/ Marianne C. Lanuti
MARIANNE C. LANUTI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
10
Date: March 2, 2018
11
By: s/ Kara B. Hendricks
KARA B. HENDRICKS
Attorneys for Defendants Clark County School
District, Shawn Paquette, and Kristy Keller
12
13
14
Date: March 2, 2018
15
HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES
By: s/ Trevor J. Hatfield
TREVOR J. HATFIELD
Attorneys for James P. DORAN
16
17
18
GREENBERG TRAURIG
Date: March 2, 2018
HALL, JAFFE & CLAYTON LLP
19
By: s/ Michelle R. Schwarz
STEVEN T. JAFFE
MICHELLE R. SCHWARZ
Attorneys for Defendants Clark County School
District, Shawn Paquette, and Kristy Keller
20
21
22
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-4PROPOSED STIPULATION
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 109 Filed 03/02/18 Page 6 of 6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’ scheduling order is modified as follows:
s
L/D to Complete 30(b)(6) Witness Depositions:
March 19, 2018
Supplemental Expert Reports
(for Plaintiffs designated experts):
April 13, 2018
7
Supplemental Rebuttal Expert Report
(for Defendants’designated Rebuttal Reports):
April 27, 2018
8
Completion of Expert Depositions:
May 25, 2018
9
Dispositive motion deadline:
June 22, 2018
10
Proposed joint pretrial order:
The later of July 27, 2018
or 30 days after the Court
rules on any dispositive
motions.
5
6
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: March 7 , 2018
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5PROPOSED STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?