Hurd et al v. Clark County School District et al

Filing 115

ORDER Granting 114 Third Stipulation to Modify the Scheduling Order. Motions due by 7/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 114 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MARIANNE C. LANUTI, SBN 007784 Law Offices of Marianne C. Lanuti 194 Inveraray Court Henderson, NV 89074 Tel: 702.501-1147 Fax: 702.270-2346 Nvkidslaw@gmail.com TODD BOLEY, CA Bar No. 68119 Law Offices of Todd Boley 2831 Mariner Square Dr., Ste 280 Alameda, CA 94501 Tel: (510) 836-4500 Fax: (510) 649-5170 (admitted Pro Hac Vice) 14 PETER W. ALFERT, CA Bar No. 83139 Law Offices Of Peter Alfert, P.C. 200 Pringle Ave., Suite 450 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Tel: (925) 279-3009 Fax: (925) 279-3342 (admitted Pro Hac Vice) 15 MARK E. FERRARIO, SBN 1625 KARA B. HENDRICKS, SBN 7743 WHITNEY L. WELCH, SBN 12129 Greenberg Traurig, LLP 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste 400 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 792-3773 Fax: (702) 792-9002 ferrariom@gtlaw.com hendricksk@gtlaw.com welchw@gtlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SHAWN PAQUETTE AND KRISTY KELLER Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant JAMES P. DORAN 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 TREVOR J. HATFIELD, SBN 7373 Hatfield & Associates, LTD 703 S. 8th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel: (702) 388-4469 Fax: (702) 386-9825 THatfield@HatfieldLawAssociates.com BROOK M. HURD, GERALDINE C. HURD, AND M.H., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, BROOK M. HURD; LUIS O. VILLALOBOS; OLIVIA N. ESPINOZA; AND L.M.V., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OLIVIA N. ESPINOZA; Case No. 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-NJK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER [THIRD REQUEST] Plaintiffs, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMES P. DORAN, SHAWN PAQUETTE, AND KRISTY KELLER Defendants. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-NJK Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 114 Filed 03/28/18 Page 2 of 4 1 WHEREAS, on March 2, 2018 the parties filed a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to 2 Modify the Scheduling Order (ECF Doc. 109) and the Order was signed by this Court on March 3 7, 2018 (ECF Doc. 110); and 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 WHEREAS, the Order extended the deadline for the Supplemental Reports of Plaintiffs’ Experts to April 13, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Order continued the deadline for the Supplemental Rebuttal Reports of Defendants’Experts to April 27, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Order continued the deadline by which Expert Depositions must be completed to May 25, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Order continued the deadline by which Dispositive Motions must be filed to June 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, the parties just concluded the depositions of Defendant CCSD’ 30(b)(6) s witnesses on March 19, 2018; and WHEREAS, the experts for the parties have received the transcripts from twenty-eight 15 (28) depositions since their original reports were prepared and require additional time to review 16 and consider the testimony and prepare supplemental reports; and 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, counsel for plaintiffs Marianne Lannuti has a prepaid vacation and is scheduled to be out of the country from April 8, 2018 through April 25, 2018; and WHEREAS, counsel for plaintiffs Peter Alfert has a prepaid vacation and is scheduled to be out of the country from May 1, 2018 to May 19, 2018; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-entitled action that the deadlines are briefly extended as follows: 1. The deadline for Supplemental Reports of Plaintiffs’Experts shall be extended by two (2) weeks to April 27, 2018; 2. The deadline for Supplemental Rebuttal Reports of Defendants’Experts shall be extended by two (2) weeks to May 11, 2018; 3. The deadline to complete Expert Depositions shall be extended by two (2) weeks to June 8, 2018; -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-NJK Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 114 Filed 03/28/18 Page 3 of 4 1 2 4. The deadline for Dispositive Motion shall be extended by four (4) weeks to July 20, 2018; 3 4 Date: March 27, 2018 5 By: s/ Peter W. Alfert PETER W. ALFERT IAN A. HANSEN Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 LAW OFFICES OF PETER W. ALFERT Date: March 27, 2018 9 LAW OFFICES OF MARIANNE C. LANUTI By: s/ Marianne C. Lanuti MARIANNE C. LANUTI Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 11 12 Date: March 27, 2018 13 By: s/ Kara B. Hendricks KARA B. HENDRICKS Attorneys for Defendants Clark County School District, Shawn Paquette, and Kristy Keller 14 15 16 Date: March 27, 2018 17 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES By: s/ Trevor J. Hatfield TREVOR J. HATFIELD Attorneys for James P. DORAN 18 19 20 GREENBERG TRAURIG Date: March 27, 2018 HALL, JAFFE & CLAYTON LLP 21 By: s/ Michelle R. Schwarz STEVEN T. JAFFE MICHELLE R. SCHWARZ Attorneys for Defendants Clark County School District, Shawn Paquette, and Kristy Keller 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-NJK Case 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-PAL Document 114 Filed 03/28/18 Page 4 of 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, the following deadlines are briefly extended as follows: 1. The deadline for Supplemental Reports of Plaintiffs’Experts shall be extended by two (2) weeks to April 27, 2018; 2. The deadline for Supplemental Rebuttal Reports of Defendants’Experts shall be extended by two (2) weeks to May 11, 2018; 3. The deadline to complete Expert Depositions shall be extended by two (2) weeks to June 8, 2018; 4. The deadline for Dispositive Motion shall be extended by four (4) weeks to July 20, 2018; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 13 14 April 2 Dated: _______________ , 2018 15 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2:16-cv-02011-GMN-NJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?