Weesner v. Colvin
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 27 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 5/11/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
4
Howard D. Olinsky
OLINSKY LAW GROUP
300 S. State Street, Ste 420
Syracuse, NY 13202
Ph: 315-701-5780
Fax: 315-701-5781
Email: holinsky@windisability.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, NSBN 13644
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
TINA NAICKER, CSBN 252766
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5611
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
THERESA M. WEESNER,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02018-RFB-PAL
___________
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA).
(First Extension Request)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that
the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees Under Equal Justice Access Act
(EAJA)(Dkt No. 26) be extended from March 11, 2019 to May 11, 2019. Good cause exists to grant
24
Defendant’s request for extension. Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) apologizes for the belated
25
request for extension, but seeks an extension of time as Counsel was out of the office on intermittent
26
sick leave for over two and half weeks in early March with the flu/pneumonia and did not accurately
-1-
1
calendar Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees Under EAJA, which was due
2
at the same time. Good cause also exists, as Counsel has over 80+ active social security matters that
3
require two or more dispositive motions per week until mid-May. Due to Counsel’s workload and
4
unexpected leave, Counsel needs additional time to properly respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and/or
5
engage in settlement negotiations to settle the matter without further motion practice. Defendant
6
7
makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further
stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
8
9
10
Dated: April 11, 2019
s/ *Howard Olinsky
(*as authorized by email on April 11, 2019)
HOWARD OLINSKY
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: April 11, 2019
NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
11
12
13
14
15
16
By
17
18
19
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
April 19, 2019
DATED:_______________________
____________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT
TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA).
on the date and via the method of service identified below:
7
8
CM/ECF:
9
Howard D. Olinsky
Olinsky Law Group
300 S. State Street
Ste 420
Syracuse, NY 13202
315-701-5780
Fax: 315-701-5781
Email: holinsky@windisability.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Hal Taylor
223 Marsh Avenue
Reno, NV 89509
775-825-2223
Fax: 775-329-1113
Email: haltaylorlawyer@gbis.com
Respectfully submitted this 11th day of April 2019,
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
24
25
26
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?