Weesner v. Colvin

Filing 28

ORDER Granting 27 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 5/11/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
4 Howard D. Olinsky OLINSKY LAW GROUP 300 S. State Street, Ste 420 Syracuse, NY 13202 Ph: 315-701-5780 Fax: 315-701-5781 Email: holinsky@windisability.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, NSBN 13644 United States Attorney District of Nevada TINA NAICKER, CSBN 252766 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5611 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 THERESA M. WEESNER, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02018-RFB-PAL ___________ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA). (First Extension Request) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees Under Equal Justice Access Act (EAJA)(Dkt No. 26) be extended from March 11, 2019 to May 11, 2019. Good cause exists to grant 24 Defendant’s request for extension. Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) apologizes for the belated 25 request for extension, but seeks an extension of time as Counsel was out of the office on intermittent 26 sick leave for over two and half weeks in early March with the flu/pneumonia and did not accurately -1- 1 calendar Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees Under EAJA, which was due 2 at the same time. Good cause also exists, as Counsel has over 80+ active social security matters that 3 require two or more dispositive motions per week until mid-May. Due to Counsel’s workload and 4 unexpected leave, Counsel needs additional time to properly respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and/or 5 engage in settlement negotiations to settle the matter without further motion practice. Defendant 6 7 makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Respectfully submitted, 8 9 10 Dated: April 11, 2019 s/ *Howard Olinsky (*as authorized by email on April 11, 2019) HOWARD OLINSKY Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: April 11, 2019 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 11 12 13 14 15 16 By 17 18 19 /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant ORDER 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 April 19, 2019 DATED:_______________________ ____________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA). on the date and via the method of service identified below: 7 8 CM/ECF: 9 Howard D. Olinsky Olinsky Law Group 300 S. State Street Ste 420 Syracuse, NY 13202 315-701-5780 Fax: 315-701-5781 Email: holinsky@windisability.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hal Taylor 223 Marsh Avenue Reno, NV 89509 775-825-2223 Fax: 775-329-1113 Email: haltaylorlawyer@gbis.com Respectfully submitted this 11th day of April 2019, /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant 24 25 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?