Federal Trade Commission v. OMICS Group Inc. et al

Filing 104

ORDER granting 103 Stipulation; Re: 92 Motion for Sanctions, 94 Motion to Compel. Responses due by 6/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 6 D. NEAL TOMLINSON Nevada Bar No. 06851 neal@hyperionlegal.com KRISTINA R. KLEIST Nevada Bar No. 13520 kristina@hyperionlegal.com Hyperion Advisors 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 990-3901 Fax: (702) 999-3501 7 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. Case No. 2:16-cv-02022-GMN-VCF 14 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE OMICS GROUP INC., et al., Defendants. 16 17 Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, 18 and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and 19 Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of 20 record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 21 22 23 24 1. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel on May 9, 2018 (Dkt. Nos. 92, 94), responses due on May 23, 2018. 2. This Court granted stipulations for extensions of time (Dkt. Nos. 98 and 100) extending the due date for the response to June 8, 2018. 25 3. Defense counsel has been dealing with multiple family medical issues that have 26 required counsel to be out of the office, and additional time is needed to confer with 27 Defendants and respond to Plaintiff’s Motions. 28 Page 1 1 4. In addition, additional time is necessary due to the fact that all Defendants are 2 located in India, and that language, time zones and geographical barriers have 3 presented significant challenges in that defense counsel has encountered difficulty 4 explaining and communicating with the Defendants regarding the many issues and 5 complexities of the pending motions. 6 5. Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to extend the response date to June 22, 2018. 7 6. This Stipulation is being made in good faith between and at the request of both parties, and not for purposes of delay. 8 9 HYPERION ADVISORS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 10 Dated this 7th day of June, 2018. Dated this 7th day of June, 2018. 11 /s/ D. Neal Tomlinson D. NEAL TOMLINSON Nevada Bar No. 06851 KRISTINA R. KLEIST Nevada Bar No. 13520 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 /s/ Gregory A. Ashe ALDEN F. ABBOTT General Counsel GREGORY A. ASHE MICHAEL E. TANKERSLEY Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20850 Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the deadline for Defendants to file their responses to the Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel is hereby extended to June 22, 20 21 22 23 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 11th Dated this _____ day of ________________________, 2018. 24 United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 Respectfully submitted by: HYPERION ADVISORS 28 Page 2 1 2 3 /s/ D. Neal Tomlinson D. NEAL TOMLINSON Nevada Bar No. 06851 KRISTINA KLEIST Nevada Bar No. 13520 Attorneys for Defendants 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 7, 2018, a true and correct copy of the 3 foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE 4 DEADLINE was filed electronically with the United States District Court for the District of 5 Nevada using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification to all parties of interest participating 6 in the CM/ECF system. 7 8 9 /s/ D. Neal Tomlinson Attorney for Defendants 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?