Boytor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 9/8/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 TIMOTHY BOYTOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WAL-MART STORES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-02023-JAD-GWF ORDER 11 12 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by 13 LR 26-1(b)(5). The Order granting the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines (ECF No. 14 22) filed June 7, 2017, stated that the discovery cutoff was June 14, 2017 with the exception of the 15 one deposition to be taken on June 26, 2017. Local Rule 26-1(b)(5) requires the parties to file a 16 joint pretrial order thirty days after the dispositive motion deadline, which was July 14, 2017. 17 Therefore, the parties joint pretrial order was due no later than August 14, 2017. There are no 18 dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, 19 20 IT IS ORDERED that 1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies 21 with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than September 8, 22 2017. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up 23 to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be 24 dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 26 27 2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order. DATED this 31st day of August, 2017. 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?