Boytor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
26
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 9/8/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
TIMOTHY BOYTOR,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02023-JAD-GWF
ORDER
11
12
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by
13
LR 26-1(b)(5). The Order granting the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines (ECF No.
14
22) filed June 7, 2017, stated that the discovery cutoff was June 14, 2017 with the exception of the
15
one deposition to be taken on June 26, 2017. Local Rule 26-1(b)(5) requires the parties to file a
16
joint pretrial order thirty days after the dispositive motion deadline, which was July 14, 2017.
17
Therefore, the parties joint pretrial order was due no later than August 14, 2017. There are no
18
dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
19
20
IT IS ORDERED that
1.
Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies
21
with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than September 8,
22
2017. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up
23
to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be
24
dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
26
27
2.
The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections
thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.
DATED this 31st day of August, 2017.
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?