LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 70 plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED; all claims in this action against Brian Kabala are DISMISSED. Kabala must advise this court by 8/14/17 whether he intends to proceed with his counterclaims 22 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 64 plaintiff's motion for default is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
LHF Productions, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
Order Dismissing Claims against
Brian Kabala and Denying
Motion for Default
[ECF Nos. 64, 70]
Brian Kabala, et al.,
Plaintiff LHF Productions, Inc. moves [ECF No. 70] to dismiss its claims against defendant
Brian Kabala without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Good
cause appearing, and the court finding that this motion is suitable for disposition without oral
argument and that a response is unnecessary,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal [ECF No. 70] is
GRANTED; all claims in this action against Brian Kabala are DISMISSED. Kabala must
advise this court by August 14 whether he intends to proceed with his counterclaims [ECF No.
Plaintiff has also moved the Clerk of Court to enter default against Kabala and three
additional defendants, Ante Soda, John Koehly, and Donald Plain. ECF No. 64. As to Kabala, the
request is mooted by this dismissal. The motion is meritless against the other defendants. Soda and
Plain have answered or otherwise responded, see ECF No. 18 (Plain’s answer), ECF No. 19 (Soda’s
motion to dismiss); and default was already entered against Koehly, see ECF No. 46. And it appears
from the “Notice of Corrected Image” [ECF No. 65] that the motion was filed “in error and should
be disregarded.” Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for default [ECF No. 64] is DENIED.
Dated this 26th day of July, 2017.
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?