LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does

Filing 87

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 86 the joint motion is GRANTED, and all claims against Ante Soda are DISMISSED, each party to bear its own fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Ante Soda's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:16-cv-02028-JAD-NJK Document 86 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6

CHARLES C. RAINEY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10723

[e-mail]

HAMRICK & EVANS LLP
7670 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 140
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
+1.702.425.5100 (ph)
+1.818.763.2308 (fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

7
8
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12
13
14
15
16

LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Nevada
corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BRIAN KABALA; JOHN KOEHLY;
DONALD PLAIN; ANTE SODA
Defendants.

) Case No.: 2:16-cv-02028-JAD-NJK
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17
18

JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT ANTE SODA

ECF Nos. 19, 86

19
20

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL PARTIES HEREIN:

21
22

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff LHF

23

PRODUCTIONS, INC. (“PLAINTIFF”), by and through its counsel, Charles

24

Rainey, Esq. of HAMRICK & EVANS LLP, and Defendant ANTE SODA in proper

25

person, hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss Defendant ANTE SODA from the

26

above-captioned case and further stipulate and agree to the dismissal of all

27

counter-claims or other causes of actions, if any, raised by Defendant ANTE SODA

28
{170929 - 2028 - SIGNED Stipulation to Dismiss Ante Soda.doc }

1

HAMRICK & EVANS LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

Case 2:16-cv-02028-JAD-NJK Document 86 Filed 09/29/17 Page 2 of 4

1

against Plaintiff LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC., each party to bear its own fees and

2

costs.

3

Respectfully submitted September 22, 2017

4

6
7
8
9
10

HAMRICK & EVANS LLP

ANTE SODA

/s/ Charles C. Rainey

/s/ Ante Soda

CHARLES C. RAINEY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10723
[e-mail]
7670 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 140
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
+1.702.425.5100 (ph)

ANTE SODA

Defendant in proper person

Attorney for Plaintiff

11

ORDER

12

Based on construes thisstipulation [ECF No. plaintiff’sgood cause appearing, IT IS
The court the parties’ stipulation to dismiss 86] and claims against Defendant

13

HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against and by ANTE SODA are DISMISSED,

14

Ante Soda [ECF 86] as a joint motion under Local Rule 7-1(c) because it was signed
by fewer than all parties to this case. Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED
eachthe joint motion [ECF feesis GRANTED, and all claims against Ante Soda are
that party to bear its own 86] and costs.
DISMISSED, each party to bear its own fees and costs.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED _________________.
Dated: Las Vegas, Nevada that Ante Soda’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF 19] is DENIED as
moot.

17

_____________________________
_________________ _ __
_ _____ _____
___
______
_____________________________________
U.S. District Jennifer Dorsey
S. District
D ict
r Dorsey
s
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
October 2, 2017
ctober 2 2017

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{170929 - 2028 - SIGNED Stipulation to Dismiss Ante Soda.doc }

2

HAMRICK & EVANS LLP

5