Sadallah v. US Bank Default Servicing et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Stipulation of dismissal with prejudice as to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. only. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/30/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
FAX: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
ANTON E. SADALLAH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
ANTON E. SADALLAH,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
US BANK DEFAULT SERVICING;
FEDERAL HOME LOAN
MORTGAGE CORP.; FIA CARD
SERVICES, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02052-APG-GWF
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO FEDERAL
HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP.
ONLY
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff ANTON E. SADALLAH and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
19
20
hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with
21
prejudice in accordance
22
23
…
…
24
…
25
…
Page 1 of 2
1
with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2) as to, and ONLY as to, Federal Home Loan
2
Mortgage Corp. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, prejudgment interest,
3
and costs of suit.
Dated:
4
December 29, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
By:
/s/David H. Krieger, Esq.
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Lindsay Demaree, Esq.
Lindsay Demaree, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11949
Ballard Spahr LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Attorney for Defendant
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
13
14
15
16
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED
17
19
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
12/30/2016
DATED: ____________________
18
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?