Birkan v. Seterus, Inc. et al

Filing 9

ORDER Granting 8 Stipulation To Extend Seterus, Inc.'s Time To Respond To Complaint (First Request) re 1 Complaint. Responses due by 10/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/7/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Case 2:16-cv-02060-APG-PAL Document 8 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

J Christopher Jorgensen
Nevada Bar No. 5382
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP
3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Seterus, Inc.

6
7
8
9
10
11

David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
James Birkan

12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13
14
15

JAMES BIRKAN,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No.: 2:16-cv-02060-APG-PAL

vs.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT SETERUS, INC.’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

SETERUS, INC.; TOYOTA
FINANCIAL SERVICES; FEDERAL
NATIONAL MORTGAGE
(FIRST REQUEST)
ASSOCIATION A/K/A FANNIE MAE;
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
Compl. Filed: August 30, 2016
SERVICES, LLC; INNOVIS DATA
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Hon. Judge Andrew P. Gordon
Hon. Mag. Judge Peggy A. Leen
Defendants.

Case 2:16-cv-02060-APG-PAL Document 8 Filed 10/06/16 Page 2 of 3

1

This Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint is made by and

2

between Plaintiff James Birkan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Seterus, Inc.

3

(“Seterus”) through their respective counsel, in light of the following facts:

4

RECITALS

5
6

A.

Plaintiff filed the Complaint (“Complaint”) against Seterus on or

about August 30, 2016.

7

B.

Seterus was served with the Complaint on September 19, 2016.

8

C.

Seterus’ current deadline to respond is October 11, 2016.

9

D.

The parties agreed to extend Seterus’ time to respond to the

10

Complaint through October 21, 2016, in order to give Seterus time to investigate

11

Plaintiff’s claims and prepare a proper response, and for the parties to discuss a

12

potential resolution of this matter.

13

E.

There is good cause to grant this stipulation because Seterus requires

14

additional time to investigate Plaintiff’s claims and prepare a proper response,

15

and the parties require additional time to consider a resolution of this matter.

16

F.

Pursuant to LR IA 6-2, Plaintiff and Seterus respectfully request that

17

the Court extend Seterus’ time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint through

18

October 21, 2016.

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

Case 2:16-cv-02060-APG-PAL Document 8 Filed 10/06/16 Page 3 of 3

1

STIPULATION

2

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Seterus hereby stipulate and agree that

3

Seterus has up to and including October 21, 2016, to file a response to Plaintiff’s

4

Complaint.

5

IT IS SO STIPULATED

6

DATED: October 6, 2016

7

LEWIS ROCA
ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP

8
By: /s/ J Christopher Jorgensen
J Christopher Jorgensen
Attorneys for Defendant
Seterus, Inc.

9
10
11
12

DATED: October 6, 2016

HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC

13
14

By: /s/ David H. Krieger
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
James Birkan

15
16
17
18
19

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

United States Magistrate Judge
Dated:

October 7, 2016