Braunstein v. Feil et al
Filing
4
ORDER denying 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payment of filing fees due 30 days of entry of this order. Amended Complaint shall be retained. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, 2 Copies to P - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
STEVEN BRAUNSTEIN,
5
v.
6
I.
10
12
ORDER
Defendants.
8
11
Plaintiff,
PAMELA FEIL et al.,
7
9
Case No. 2:16-cv-02062-APG-GWF
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff has submitted an amended civil
rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an application to proceed in forma
pauperis. (ECF No. 1, 3). However, on at least three (3) occasions, the Court has
13
dismissed civil actions commenced by Plaintiff while in detention as frivolous or for failure
14
to state a claim upon which any relief may be granted. 1
15
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), “if [a] prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions,
16
while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the
17
United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to
18
state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” he may not proceed in forma pauperis
19
and, instead, must pay the full $400.00 filing fee in advance unless he is “under imminent
20
danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
21
In the amended complaint, Plaintiff, who is diabetic, alleges that prison officials: (1)
22
deprived him of his legal property in 2013; (2) withheld mail; (3) subjected Plaintiff to
23
multiple harassing urinalysis tests without probable cause; (4) did not inform Plaintiff that
24
the medication he was taking would affect the results of the urinalysis tests; (5) subjected
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff to a disciplinary hearing and disciplinary segregation based on the urinalysis
See Braunstein v. Sandoval et al., 3:12-cv-00235-LRH-WGC; Braunstein v. Villani et al.,
3:12-cv-00665-MMD-VPC (both appeals dismissed as frivolous); and Braunstein v. Clark
County et al., 3:02-cv-00163-DWH-RAM (dismissed for failure to state a claim). The
Court takes judicial notice of its prior records in the above matters.
1
1
1
2
3
tests; (6) took Plaintiff’s new clothes when he moved to disciplinary segregation; and (7)
denied Plaintiff religious materials while in disciplinary segregation. (ECF No. 3 at 5-6, 8,
10, 12, 14, 17-18). The Court finds that these allegations fail to plausibly allege that
4
Plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493
5
F.3d 1047, 1055-56 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that the exception to § 1915(g) applies if the
6
complaint makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced an ongoing danger of
7
serious physical injury at the time of filing).
8
The Court notes that Plaintiff alleges that he had a hypoglycemia event while in
9
disciplinary segregation. Plaintiff alleges the following: On December 15, 2015, a nurse
10
had to order Plaintiff additional food (i.e. a “PM snack”) because Plaintiff had gone into
11
shock while in disciplinary segregation. (ECF No. 3 at 15, 18). This happened to Plaintiff
12
due to the lack of food. (Id. at 18). The Court finds that this one-time event in 2015 does
13
not plausibly allege that Plaintiff faced an ongoing danger of serious physical injury at the
14
time of filing.2 As such, Plaintiff must pre-pay the $400.00 filing fee in full.
15
II.
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in
16
17
forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is denied.
It is further ordered that this action will be dismissed without prejudice unless
18
19
20
21
22
23
CONCLUSION
Plaintiff pays the $400.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this order.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two copies of this
order. Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order
attached to the check paying the filing fee.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the amended complaint
(ECF No. 3).
24
Dated: June 20, 2017.
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
Plaintiff submitted his complaint on August 29, 2016 and his amended complaint on
May 30, 2017. (ECF No. 1-1, 3).
2
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?