Gonzalez Ambrioso v. Garcia Ledesma

Filing 30

ORDER that 29 MOTION for Leave to File Reply re: Witnesses Testifying Via Visual Conferencing / Transmission is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as to due date. Plaintiff must file his reply brief on or before noon on October 24, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 VLADIMIR GONZALEZ AMBRIOSO, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. CARMEN GARCIA LEDESMA, 8 2:16-cv-02091-GMN-VCF ORDER Defendant. 9 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of His Brief Regarding 10 Witnesses Testifying Via Visual Conferencing/Transmission. (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff seeks to file the 11 reply brief by October 25, 2016. Id. 12 Accordingly, 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of His Brief 14 Regarding Witnesses Testifying Via Visual Conferencing/Transmission. (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED in 15 part and DENIED in part, as to due date. Plaintiff must file his reply brief on or before noon on October 16 24, 2016. 17 DATED this 18th day of October, 2016. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?