Haggard v. Ascent Mortgage Resource Group, LLC
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:16-cv-02134-JCM-PAL Document 15 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
FAX: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, ANNIE HAGGARD
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
ASCENT MORTGAGE RESOURCE )
)
GROUP, LLC D/B/A AMERICAN
)
)
RENT-TO-OWN,
)
Defendant.
ANNIE HAGGARD,
Case No. 2:16-cv-02134-JCM-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
16
Plaintiff ANNIE HAGGARD and Defendant ASCENT MORTGAGE
17
18
RESOURCE GROUP, LLC D/B/A AMERICAN RENT-TO-OWN hereby
stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice
19
20
…
…
21
…
22
…
23
…
24
…
25
…
26
Page 1 of 2
27
28
Case 2:16-cv-02134-JCM-PAL Document 15 Filed 05/12/17 Page 2 of 2
1
in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2). Each party shall bear its own
2
attorney's fees, and costs of suit.
Dated:
3
May 12, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
/s/David H. Krieger, Esq.
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Attorney for Plaintiff
By:
/s/ Joshua F. Bugos, Esq.
Joshua F. Bugos, Esq.
Condit Csajaghy LLC
695 South Colorado Blvd.
Suite 270
Denver, CO 80246
Attorney for Defendant ASCENT
MORTGAGE RESOURCE GROUP,
LLC D/B/A AMERICAN RENT-TOOWN
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
IT IS SO ORDERED
18
19
20
21
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
May 18, 2017
DATED: ____________________
22
23
24
25
26
Page 2 of 2
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?