H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Chattem Chemicals, Inc., et al
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation to Stay Remaining Discovery. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status hearing is scheduled for 2:00 PM, 7/10/17, in Courtroom 3D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
6
LUIS A. AYON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9752
JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9046
MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Telephone: 702.629.7900
Facsimile: 702.629.7925
E-mail:
laa@mgalaw.com
jag@mgalaw.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
H&H PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02148-GMN-VCF
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY
REMAINING DISCOVERY PENDING
vs.
RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
CHATTEM CHEMICALS, INC., a foreign COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 15]
corporation; SUN PHARMACEUTICALS
INDUSTRIES, INC., a foreign corporation;
DOES
I
through
X;
and
ROE
CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Plaintiff H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys of record, the
21
law firm MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON and defendants Chattem Chemicals, Inc. and Sun
22
Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of
23
record, the law firms of ROBISON, BELAUSTEGUI, SHARP & LOW and STINSON LEONARD STREET
24
LLP, hereby stipulate to request the Court to accept and institute a limited stay of the remaining
25
discovery pending resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint [ECF No. 15]
26
filed under seal on September 29, 2016. On October 24, 2016, Plaintiff filed an opposition to
27
Defendants’ motion to dismiss [ECF No. 22]. Thereafter, Defendants’ filed under seal their reply in
28
support of the motion to dismiss [ECF No. 27] on November 15, 2016.
1
1
The parties have proceeded with conducting discovery but are in agreement that the costs for
2
retaining the various experts needed in this complex case will continue to accumulate at a fast pace,
3
whereas the discovery costs could potentially become more manageable based on the outcome of
4
Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss. Because Plaintiffs have asserted eleven separate claims for
5
relief, the parties respectfully request that discovery and the dispositive motion deadline be stayed
6
until it is clear what claims are going to survive the pleading phase, so that no further costs are
7
expended on potentially unnecessary discovery.
8
This is the parties’ first request to stay discovery. The parties bring forth this request in good
9
faith and not for the purpose of delay. It is important to note that a trial date has not yet been set in
10
this case, and as such, the trial will not need to be postponed due to the requested stay.
11
DATED this 20th day of March, 2017.
DATED this 20th day of March, 2017.
12
MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON
STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP
__/s/ Luis A. Ayon_____________
LUIS A. AYON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9752
JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9046
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Attorneys for Plaintiff
H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC
__/s/ Cicely I. Lubben_________________
Cicely I. Lubben, Esq.
Admitted Pro Hace Vice
7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1100
St. Louis, Missouri 63105
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MICHAEL E. SULLIVAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5142
BARRY L. BRESLOW, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3023
SCOTT L. HERNANDEZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13147
ROBINSON BELAUSTEGUI SHARP & LOW
71 Washington Street
Reno, Nevada 89503
Attorneys for Defendants Chattem Chemicals,
Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status hearing
is scheduled for 2:00 PM, July 10, 2017,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
in Courtroom 3D.
25
26
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
DATED this 20th day of March, 2017.
____
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?