H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Chattem Chemicals, Inc., et al

Filing 95

ORDER granting 94 Stipulation Re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment, Responses due by 1/11/2022. Replies due by 2/1/2022. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/4/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:16-cv-02148-GMN-VCF Document 95 Filed 01/04/22 Page 1 of 2

1

6

JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9046
DANIELLE J. BARRAZA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13822
MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.629.7925
E-mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC

2
3
4
5

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13

H&H PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company,

14

Case No.:

2:16-cv-02148-GMN-VCF

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN
ORDER TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF NO. 89]

Plaintiff,

15

vs.

16

CHATTEM CHEMICALS, INC., a foreign
corporation;
SUN
PHARMACEUTICALS (Second Request)
INDUSTRIES, INC., a foreign corporation;
DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS
I through X, inclusive,

17
18
19

Defendants.

20
21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, plaintiff H&H

22

Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys of record, the law firm MAIER

23

GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES, and defendants Chattem Chemicals, Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals

24

Industries, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, the law firms of

25

KAEMPFER CROWELL and TUCKER ELLIS LLP, that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to

26

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 89] filed on November 23, 2021, shall be

27

continued from January 4, 2022, to and including January 11, 2022. Defendants shall have up to and

28

including February 1, 2022 to file any reply to Plaintiff’s response.
1

Case 2:16-cv-02148-GMN-VCF Document 95 Filed 01/04/22 Page 2 of 2

1

The requested extension is necessary to allow Plaintiff sufficient time to review and

2

appropriately respond to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and to allow Defendants

3

sufficient time to prepare a reply brief, in light of holiday schedules which created staffing issues, and

4

commitments which have required this additional time. This is the parties’ second request for an

5

extension and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party.

6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7

DATED this 3rd day of January 2022.

DATED this 3rd day of January 2022.

8

MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES

KAEMPFER CROWELL

9

/s/ Danielle J. Barraza
______________________________
JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9046
DANIELLE J. BARRAZA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13822
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Attorneys for Plaintiff
H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC

/s/ Cicely I Lubben
____________________________
ROBERT MCCOY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9121
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Cicely I. Lubben, Esq.
Admitted Pro Hace Vice
TUCKER ELLIS LLP
100 South Fourth Street, Suite 600
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
Attorneys for Defendants Chattem Chemicals,
Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc.

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

4
Dated this ____ day of January, 2022

21
22
23
24

___________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

25
26
27
28
2