Smith v. One Nevada Credit Union

Filing 65

ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice and Final Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 4 5 6 Joseph J. Smith, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 7 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK CLASS ACTION 8 v. FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 9 One Nevada Credit Union, HON. GLORIA M. NAVARRO Plaintiff, 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 On October 6, 2017, after extensive arms-length negotiations, and private 14 mediation conducted before Honorable Jackie Glass (Ret.), Plaintiff and Defendant 15 (herein jointly referred to as the “Parties”) entered in to a Class Action Settlement 16 Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”), which is subject to review 17 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, for monetary damages as set forth in the Agreement. 18 On December 4, 2017, the Parties filed the Agreement, along with a Joint 19 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Agreement 20 (hereinafter referred to as the “Preliminary Approval Motion”). 21 On September 16, 2018, upon consideration of the Agreement, Preliminary 22 Approval Motion, and the record, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary 23 Approval of Class Action Settlement (hereinafter referred to as the “Preliminary 24 Approval Order”). Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, the Court, among 25 other things, (i) preliminarily approved the proposed settlement; (ii) approved the 26 Notice and instructed its mailing; and (iii) set the date and time of the Final 27 Approval Hearing. 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER !1 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK 1 On February 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Motion for Final Approval of Class 2 Action Settlement (hereinafter referred to as the “Final Approval Motion”). 3 Pursuant to their Final Approval Motion, the parties requests final approval of the 4 proposed Class Action Settlement. 5 The Court has read and considered the Agreement, Final Approval Motion, 6 and the record. All capitalized terms used herein have the meanings defined herein 7 and/or in the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 8 9 10 1. JURISDICTION: The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Lawsuit and over all settling parties hereto. 11 2. NOTICE AND CLAIMS PROCESS: Pursuant to the Court’s Preliminary 12 Approval Order, the Claims Administrator has complied with the approved 13 notice process as confirmed in its declaration filed with the Court. The form and 14 method for notifying the Settlement Class members of the settlement and its 15 terms and conditions was in conformity with this Court’s Preliminary Approval 16 Order and satisfied the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B) and due 17 process, and constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances. 18 The Court finds that the notice process was clearly designed to advise the 19 Settlement Class members of their rights. Further, the Court finds that the claim 20 process set forth in the Agreement was followed and that the process was the 21 best practicable procedure under the circumstances. 22 3. FINAL CLASS CERTIFICATION: The Court again finds that the Lawsuit 23 satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Fed. R. 24 Civ. P. 23, namely: 25 A. them in the Lawsuit would be impracticable; 26 27 The Settlement Class members are so numerous that joinder of all of B. There are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class members, which predominate over any individual questions; 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER !2 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK 1 C. members; 2 3 D. Plaintiff and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the interests of all the Settlement Class members; and 4 5 The claims of Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class E. Class treatment of these claims will be efficient and manageable, thereby 6 achieving an appreciable measure of judicial economy, and a class action 7 is superior to other available methods for a fair and efficient adjudication 8 of this controversy. 9 4. The Court finds that the settlement of the Lawsuit, on the terms and conditions 10 set forth in the Agreement, is in all respects fundamentally fair, reasonable, 11 adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class members, especially 12 in light of the benefits to the Settlement Class members, the strength of 13 Plaintiff’s case, the complexity, expense and probable duration of further 14 litigation, the risk and delay inherent in possible appeals, and the risk of 15 collecting any judgment obtained on behalf of the class. 16 5. SETTLEMENT TERMS: The Agreement, which has been filed with the Court 17 and shall be deemed incorporated herein, and the proposed settlement are 18 finally approved and shall be consummated in accordance with the terms and 19 provisions thereof, except as amended by any order issued by this Court. The 20 material terms of the Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following: 21 A. claim, on or before 12:00 p.m. on March 5, 2019, $20.66; 22 23 B. Defendant shall pay to Class Counsel the sum of $171,490.33 as attorneys’ fees and $8,509.67 as costs incurred in litigating this action; 24 25 Defendant shall pay each of the 13,069 claimants that made a valid C. Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff $5,000 as an incentive award. 26 6. EXCLUSIONS: A total of 4 exclusions were received. Those persons requesting 27 exclusion are named on Exhibit A to this Order. The Court hereby excludes 28 these individuals from the class and settlement. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER !3 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK 1 7. OBJECTIONS: The Settlement Class members were given an opportunity to object to the settlement. No Settlement Class members filed objections. 2 3 8. This Order is binding on all Settlement Class members, except those individuals 4 who validly and timely excluded themselves from the Class. (See Ex. A, ECF 5 No. 64). 6 9. RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT: The Class 7 Representative, Settlement Class members, and their successors and assigns are 8 permanently barred and enjoined from instituting or prosecuting, either 9 individually or as a class, or in any other capacity, any of the Released Claims 10 against any of the Released Parties, as set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to 11 the release contained in the Agreement, the Released Claims are compromised, 12 discharged, and dismissed with prejudice by virtue of these proceedings and this 13 Order. 14 10. The Lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice in all respects. 15 11. This Order is not, and shall not be construed as, an admission by Defendant of any liability or wrongdoing in this or in any other proceeding. 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 ///
 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER !4 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK 1 12. Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal 2 With Prejudice, the Court hereby retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction 3 over the Parties and all matters relating to the Lawsuit and/or Agreement, 4 including the administration, interpretation, construction, effectuation, 5 enforcement, and consummation of the settlement and this order. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 7 8 9 DATED this______day of March, 2019. 29 10 11 ______________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER !5 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?