Smith v. One Nevada Credit Union
Filing
65
ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice and Final Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2
3
4
5
6
Joseph J. Smith, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly
situated,
7
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK
CLASS ACTION
8
v.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
9
One Nevada Credit Union,
HON. GLORIA M. NAVARRO
Plaintiff,
10
Defendant.
11
12
13
On October 6, 2017, after extensive arms-length negotiations, and private
14
mediation conducted before Honorable Jackie Glass (Ret.), Plaintiff and Defendant
15
(herein jointly referred to as the “Parties”) entered in to a Class Action Settlement
16
Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”), which is subject to review
17
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, for monetary damages as set forth in the Agreement.
18
On December 4, 2017, the Parties filed the Agreement, along with a Joint
19
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Agreement
20
(hereinafter referred to as the “Preliminary Approval Motion”).
21
On September 16, 2018, upon consideration of the Agreement, Preliminary
22
Approval Motion, and the record, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary
23
Approval of Class Action Settlement (hereinafter referred to as the “Preliminary
24
Approval Order”). Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, the Court, among
25
other things, (i) preliminarily approved the proposed settlement; (ii) approved the
26
Notice and instructed its mailing; and (iii) set the date and time of the Final
27
Approval Hearing.
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
!1
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK
1
On February 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Motion for Final Approval of Class
2
Action Settlement (hereinafter referred to as the “Final Approval Motion”).
3
Pursuant to their Final Approval Motion, the parties requests final approval of the
4
proposed Class Action Settlement.
5
The Court has read and considered the Agreement, Final Approval Motion,
6
and the record. All capitalized terms used herein have the meanings defined herein
7
and/or in the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
8
9
10
1. JURISDICTION: The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the
Lawsuit and over all settling parties hereto.
11
2. NOTICE AND CLAIMS PROCESS: Pursuant to the Court’s Preliminary
12
Approval Order, the Claims Administrator has complied with the approved
13
notice process as confirmed in its declaration filed with the Court. The form and
14
method for notifying the Settlement Class members of the settlement and its
15
terms and conditions was in conformity with this Court’s Preliminary Approval
16
Order and satisfied the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B) and due
17
process, and constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances.
18
The Court finds that the notice process was clearly designed to advise the
19
Settlement Class members of their rights. Further, the Court finds that the claim
20
process set forth in the Agreement was followed and that the process was the
21
best practicable procedure under the circumstances.
22
3. FINAL CLASS CERTIFICATION: The Court again finds that the Lawsuit
23
satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Fed. R.
24
Civ. P. 23, namely:
25
A.
them in the Lawsuit would be impracticable;
26
27
The Settlement Class members are so numerous that joinder of all of
B.
There are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class
members, which predominate over any individual questions;
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
!2
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK
1
C.
members;
2
3
D.
Plaintiff and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and
protected the interests of all the Settlement Class members; and
4
5
The claims of Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class
E.
Class treatment of these claims will be efficient and manageable, thereby
6
achieving an appreciable measure of judicial economy, and a class action
7
is superior to other available methods for a fair and efficient adjudication
8
of this controversy.
9
4. The Court finds that the settlement of the Lawsuit, on the terms and conditions
10
set forth in the Agreement, is in all respects fundamentally fair, reasonable,
11
adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class members, especially
12
in light of the benefits to the Settlement Class members, the strength of
13
Plaintiff’s case, the complexity, expense and probable duration of further
14
litigation, the risk and delay inherent in possible appeals, and the risk of
15
collecting any judgment obtained on behalf of the class.
16
5. SETTLEMENT TERMS: The Agreement, which has been filed with the Court
17
and shall be deemed incorporated herein, and the proposed settlement are
18
finally approved and shall be consummated in accordance with the terms and
19
provisions thereof, except as amended by any order issued by this Court. The
20
material terms of the Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following:
21
A.
claim, on or before 12:00 p.m. on March 5, 2019, $20.66;
22
23
B.
Defendant shall pay to Class Counsel the sum of $171,490.33 as
attorneys’ fees and $8,509.67 as costs incurred in litigating this action;
24
25
Defendant shall pay each of the 13,069 claimants that made a valid
C.
Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff $5,000 as an incentive award.
26
6. EXCLUSIONS: A total of 4 exclusions were received. Those persons requesting
27
exclusion are named on Exhibit A to this Order. The Court hereby excludes
28
these individuals from the class and settlement.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
!3
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK
1
7. OBJECTIONS: The Settlement Class members were given an opportunity to
object to the settlement. No Settlement Class members filed objections.
2
3
8. This Order is binding on all Settlement Class members, except those individuals
4
who validly and timely excluded themselves from the Class. (See Ex. A, ECF
5
No. 64).
6
9. RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT: The Class
7
Representative, Settlement Class members, and their successors and assigns are
8
permanently barred and enjoined from instituting or prosecuting, either
9
individually or as a class, or in any other capacity, any of the Released Claims
10
against any of the Released Parties, as set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to
11
the release contained in the Agreement, the Released Claims are compromised,
12
discharged, and dismissed with prejudice by virtue of these proceedings and this
13
Order.
14
10. The Lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice in all respects.
15
11. This Order is not, and shall not be construed as, an admission by Defendant of
any liability or wrongdoing in this or in any other proceeding.
16
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
!4
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK
1
12. Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal
2
With Prejudice, the Court hereby retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction
3
over the Parties and all matters relating to the Lawsuit and/or Agreement,
4
including the administration, interpretation, construction, effectuation,
5
enforcement, and consummation of the settlement and this order.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED:
7
8
9 DATED this______day of March, 2019.
29
10
11
______________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
!5
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02156-GMN-NJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?