Stevens v. Dzurenda et al

Filing 43

ORDER. The court is in receipt of discovery documents filed by plaintiff. (Notice (ECF Nos. 41, 42).) Plaintiff is advised that [u]nless the court orders otherwise, written discovery, including discovery requests, discovery responses, deposition not ices, and deposition transcripts, must not be filed with the court. LR 26-8. The court will therefore strike the discovery documents from the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 THEODORE STEVENS, 7 8 9 Case No. 2:16-cv-02166-RFB-CWH Plaintiff, ORDER v. JAMES DZURENDA, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 The court is in receipt of discovery documents filed by plaintiff. (Notice (ECF Nos. 41, 13 42).) Plaintiff is advised that “[u]nless the court orders otherwise, written discovery, including 14 discovery requests, discovery responses, deposition notices, and deposition transcripts, must not 15 be filed with the court.” LR 26-8. The court will therefore strike the discovery documents from 16 the docket. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 DATED: January 17, 2019 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?