Manheimer v. Trufusion Yoga, LLC et al
Filing
125
ORDER granting 123 Stipulation re Discovery. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:16-cv-02186-JCM-NJK Document 123 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
William O’Brien (CA Bar No. 99526)
Joanna Ardalan (CA Bar No. 285384)
Admitted pro hac vice
ONE LLP
9301 Wilshire Blvd
Penthouse Suite
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Telephone: (310) 437-8665
Facsimile: (310) 943-2085
David R. Koch (NV Bar No. 8830)
KOCH & SCOW LLC
11500 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 210
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Telephone: (702) 318-5040
Facsimile: (702) 318-5039
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SETH MANHEIMER
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
16
17
18
SETH MANHEIMER, individually,
and derivatively on behalf of
TruFusion Yoga, LLC,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
v.
TRUFUSION YOGA, LLC, etc., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:16-cv-02186-JCM-NJK
STIPULATION FOR LIMITED
DISCOVERY RELATED TO RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
(First Request)
Case 2:16-cv-02186-JCM-NJK Document 123 Filed 08/24/18 Page 2 of 3
1
The Plaintiff, Seth Manheimer, and the Defendants, TruFusion Yoga LLC,
2
TruFusion LLC, and TruFusion Franchising LLC (collectively, “TruFusion”), Michael
3
Borden, Martin Hinton, stipulate and agree as follows:
4
1.
Since the close of discovery in this case, multiple events have occurred that
5
are potentially relevant to issues in this case. As supplemental discovery responses,
6
Defendants have provided Plaintiff with numerous documents containing information
7
potentially relevant to this case. Most recently, Plaintiff received numerous additional
8
documents on August 2, 2018.
9
2.
Manheimer has requested additional discovery related to certain events that
10
have occurred since the close of discovery and related to certain documents that have been
11
produced since the close of discovery. Counsel for the parties have met and conferred
12
about this request.
13
3.
In response to the conference between counsel, the Defendants provided
14
Manheimer, on August 23, 2018, with access to additional documents, which Manheimer’s
15
counsel are in the process of reviewing.
16
17
18
4.
In addition, the parties have agreed that discovery be reopened for the limited
purpose of permitting Manheimer to conduct any or all of the following depositions:
(a)
A deposition of TruFusion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) not
19
to exceed five hours, on subjects related to events that have occurred since the close of
20
discovery and related to documents that have been produced since the close of discovery.
21
The parties have agreed that this will be conducted on August 29, 2018, beginning at noon,
22
at the offices of Koch & Scow in Las Vegas.
23
(b)
Depositions (with associated document production) of potential investors in
24
TruFusion named TSG 7 B L.P. and Castanea Partners, Inc. (or, alternatively,
25
knowledgeable persons associated with them) on dates mutually agreeable to counsel for
26
the parties.
27
28
5.
This is the first request to reopen discovery in this case. Manheimer reserves
rights to request further documents or information. Manheimer’s counsel will consult with
1
Case 2:16-cv-02186-JCM-NJK Document 123 Filed 08/24/18 Page 3 of 3
1
Defendants’ counsel if Manheimer’s counsel considers the information obtained via the
2
recently provided documents and the proposed depositions to be inadequate.
3
Respectfully submitted,
4
5
Dated: August 24, 2018
6
ONE LLP
7
By:/s/William J. O’Brien
William J. O’Brien
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Seth Manheimer
9
10
Dated: August 24, 2018
LAW OFFICES OF MARK C. FIELDS APC
11
12
13
By:/s/Mark C. Fields
Mark C. Fields
14
Attorneys for Defendants, Michael Borden, Martin
15
Hinton, TruFusion LLC, and TruFusion Franchising
16
LLC
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
8/28/2018
Dated: __________________
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?