Bank of America, N.A. v. Carson Ranch East Homeowners Association et al

Filing 70

ORDER that BANA's remaining claims are dismissed as moot; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 7 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP f\k\a COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., Case No. 2:16-cv-02192-MMD-CWH ORDER 8 Plaintiff, v. 9 10 CARSON RANCH EAST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 This dispute arises from the foreclosure sale of property to satisfy a homeowners’ 14 association lien. The Court granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff Bank of 15 America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f\k\a Countrywide 16 Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (“BANA”) on its quiet title and declaratory relief claims 17 against all Defendants. (ECF No. 67 at 5.) The Court directed BANA to file a status report 18 to indicate whether it intends to pursue its remaining claims. (Id.) In the status report, 19 BANA requests that the Court either (1) certify the judgment as final under Fed. R. Civ. 20 P. 54(b) and stay the remaining claims pending any appeal or, alternatively, (2) deem 21 BANA’s remaining claims moot to allow them to be revived if judgment is reversed on 22 appeal. (ECF No. 69 at 1-2.) The Court will grant BANA’s alternative requested relief. It is therefore ordered that BANA’s remaining claims are dismissed as moot. 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. 3 4 DATED THIS 12th day of February 2019. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?