Bank of America, N.A. v. Carson Ranch East Homeowners Association et al
Filing
70
ORDER that BANA's remaining claims are dismissed as moot; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
7
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP f\k\a COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-02192-MMD-CWH
ORDER
8
Plaintiff,
v.
9
10
CARSON RANCH EAST
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
This dispute arises from the foreclosure sale of property to satisfy a homeowners’
14
association lien. The Court granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff Bank of
15
America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f\k\a Countrywide
16
Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (“BANA”) on its quiet title and declaratory relief claims
17
against all Defendants. (ECF No. 67 at 5.) The Court directed BANA to file a status report
18
to indicate whether it intends to pursue its remaining claims. (Id.) In the status report,
19
BANA requests that the Court either (1) certify the judgment as final under Fed. R. Civ.
20
P. 54(b) and stay the remaining claims pending any appeal or, alternatively, (2) deem
21
BANA’s remaining claims moot to allow them to be revived if judgment is reversed on
22
appeal. (ECF No. 69 at 1-2.) The Court will grant BANA’s alternative requested relief.
It is therefore ordered that BANA’s remaining claims are dismissed as moot.
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in accordance with this
order and close this case.
3
4
DATED THIS 12th day of February 2019.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?