Butkowski v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER. Based on 41 the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, and because this stipulation resolves all remaining claims in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:16-cv-02220-JAD-GWF Document 41 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12594
LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L.
HERNANDEZ
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
T: (702) 563-4450
F: (702) 552-0408
kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
CHARMAINE BUTKOWSKI, an individual;
11
12
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
(702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408
Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez
10
13
14
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02220-JAD-GWF
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION BETWEEN
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS
BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC. AND
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC., d/b/a
FINGERHUT, a foreign corporation;
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a foreign
corporation; EQUIFAX, INC., a foreign
corporation;
15
ECF No. 41
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, Charmaine Butkowski (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Bluestem Brands, Inc.
17
(“Bluestem”) and Navient Solutions, Inc. (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) have resolved
18
all claims, disputes, and differences between the Parties;
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-02220-JAD-GWF Document 41 Filed 07/24/17 Page 2 of 3
1
Therefore, the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of records, respectfully
2
request dismissal of the above-captioned matter with prejudice under FRCP 41(a) as to the action
3
between Plaintiff and Defendants, Bluestem and Navient, with Plaintiff and Defendants bearing
4
their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action.
5
Respectfully Submitted.
6
Dated: July 24, 2017
Dated: July 24, 2017
7
LAW OFFICE OF
KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
8
9
11
12
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
(702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408
Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Kevin L. Hernandez
Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12594
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Kyle A. Ewing______
Joel E. Tasca, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14124
Kyle A. Ewing, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14051
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
tasca@ballardspahr.com
ewingk@ballardspahr.com
Attorneys for Defendant Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Dated: July 24, 2017
AKERMAN LLP
/s/ Rex Garner
_
Rex D. Garner, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9401
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
rex.garner@akerman.com
Attorneys for Defendant Navient Solutions,
LLC f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc.
ORDER
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF
AND DEFENDANTS BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC. AND NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
WITH PREJUDICE
Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 41] and good cause appearing, and because this
Pursuant to all stipulation of the Parties under FRCP 41(a), the action between Plaintiff
stipulation resolves the remaining claims in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this
case is DISMISSED with prejudice, is dismissed with prejudice, and costs. The Clerk of
and Defendants, Bluestem and Navienteach side to bear its own feesand the Parties will bear their
Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
____________________________________
__________________
_ _ _ _ _ __
____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
D STATES DISTRICT J
T TE
T C
7-25-17
DATED: ____________________________
Page 2 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?