Butkowski v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER. Based on 41 the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, and because this stipulation resolves all remaining claims in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02220-JAD-GWF Document 41 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12594 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 T: (702) 563-4450 F: (702) 552-0408 kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 CHARMAINE BUTKOWSKI, an individual; 11 12 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 (702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408 Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez 10 13 14 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02220-JAD-GWF Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC. AND NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE v. BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC., d/b/a FINGERHUT, a foreign corporation; NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a foreign corporation; EQUIFAX, INC., a foreign corporation; 15 ECF No. 41 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Charmaine Butkowski (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Bluestem Brands, Inc. 17 (“Bluestem”) and Navient Solutions, Inc. (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) have resolved 18 all claims, disputes, and differences between the Parties; 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Page 1 of 3 Case 2:16-cv-02220-JAD-GWF Document 41 Filed 07/24/17 Page 2 of 3 1 Therefore, the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of records, respectfully 2 request dismissal of the above-captioned matter with prejudice under FRCP 41(a) as to the action 3 between Plaintiff and Defendants, Bluestem and Navient, with Plaintiff and Defendants bearing 4 their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action. 5 Respectfully Submitted. 6 Dated: July 24, 2017 Dated: July 24, 2017 7 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ BALLARD SPAHR LLP 8 9 11 12 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 (702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408 Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Kevin L. Hernandez Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12594 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Kyle A. Ewing______ Joel E. Tasca, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14124 Kyle A. Ewing, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14051 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 tasca@ballardspahr.com ewingk@ballardspahr.com Attorneys for Defendant Bluestem Brands, Inc. Dated: July 24, 2017 AKERMAN LLP /s/ Rex Garner _ Rex D. Garner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9401 1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 rex.garner@akerman.com Attorneys for Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc. ORDER ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC. AND NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 41] and good cause appearing, and because this Pursuant to all stipulation of the Parties under FRCP 41(a), the action between Plaintiff stipulation resolves the remaining claims in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, is dismissed with prejudice, and costs. The Clerk of and Defendants, Bluestem and Navienteach side to bear its own feesand the Parties will bear their Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED: ____________________________________ __________________ _ _ _ _ _ __ ____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE D STATES DISTRICT J T TE T C 7-25-17 DATED: ____________________________ Page 2 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?