JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 38 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/25/2017. Replies due by 2/15/2017. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/11/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Russell J. Burke
Nevada Bar No. 12710
Kyle A. Ewing
Nevada Bar No. 14051
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Telephone: (702) 471-7000
Facsimile: (702) 471-7070
vigila@ballardspahr.com
burker@ballardspahr.com
ewingk@ballardspahr.com
Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company;
MONTAGNE MARRON COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; RODRIGO J. COLOMA, an
individual; NICOLE E. COLOMA, an
individual;
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF
TIME FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR SFR’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
Defendants.
20
21
Case No. 2:16-cv-02230-RFB-VCF
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. (“Chase”), and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (collectively, the
“Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to
allow an enlargement of time with respect to the briefing schedule for SFR’s Motion
For Partial Summary Judgment Regarding a Pure Issue of Law: Application of the
Return Doctrine Post-Bourne Valley filed on December 21, 2016 (the “Partial MSJ”).
Specifically, the Parties stipulate to the following:
DMWEST #15352330 v2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1.
Chase’s current date to file a Response to the Partial MSJ is January 11,
2.
The Parties agree that Chase may have a two-week extension such that
2017.
Chase’s Response to the Partial MSJ shall be due on or before January 25, 2017.
3.
The Parties agree that SFR’s Reply to the Partial MSJ shall be due on or
before February 15, 2017.
4.
The Parties request an enlargement of the briefing schedule due to the
8
availability of counsel as a result of the holidays as well as the novel issues in the
9
Partial MSJ.
10
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
5.
The Parties stipulate to the foregoing in good faith and not for the
2
purposes of delay.
3
Dated: this 9th day of January, 2017.
4
5
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
KIM GILBERT EBRON
/s/ Russell J. Burke
Abran E. Vigil, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Russell J. Burke
Nevada Bar No. 12710
Kyle A. Ewing
Nevada Bar No. 14051
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
/s/ Diana Cline Ebron
Diana Cline Ebron
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline A. Gilbert
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Dr., Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89014
Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A.
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1,
LLC
6
7
8
9
10
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
11
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
__________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
Dated:
United States District Judge
DATED this 11th day of January, 2017.
16
17
18
Respectfully submitted,
19
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/s/ Russell J. Burke
Abran E. Vigil, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Russell J. Burke
Nevada Bar No. 12710
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Telephone: (702) 471-7000
Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?