JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 41

ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 38 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/25/2017. Replies due by 2/15/2017. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/11/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Abran E. Vigil Nevada Bar No. 7548 Russell J. Burke Nevada Bar No. 12710 Kyle A. Ewing Nevada Bar No. 14051 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 Telephone: (702) 471-7000 Facsimile: (702) 471-7070 vigila@ballardspahr.com burker@ballardspahr.com ewingk@ballardspahr.com Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070 12 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, vs. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; MONTAGNE MARRON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation; RODRIGO J. COLOMA, an individual; NICOLE E. COLOMA, an individual; 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SFR’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) Defendants. 20 21 Case No. 2:16-cv-02230-RFB-VCF Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to allow an enlargement of time with respect to the briefing schedule for SFR’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Regarding a Pure Issue of Law: Application of the Return Doctrine Post-Bourne Valley filed on December 21, 2016 (the “Partial MSJ”). Specifically, the Parties stipulate to the following: DMWEST #15352330 v2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Chase’s current date to file a Response to the Partial MSJ is January 11, 2. The Parties agree that Chase may have a two-week extension such that 2017. Chase’s Response to the Partial MSJ shall be due on or before January 25, 2017. 3. The Parties agree that SFR’s Reply to the Partial MSJ shall be due on or before February 15, 2017. 4. The Parties request an enlargement of the briefing schedule due to the 8 availability of counsel as a result of the holidays as well as the novel issues in the 9 Partial MSJ. 10 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] (702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070 12 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 5. The Parties stipulate to the foregoing in good faith and not for the 2 purposes of delay. 3 Dated: this 9th day of January, 2017. 4 5 BALLARD SPAHR LLP KIM GILBERT EBRON /s/ Russell J. Burke Abran E. Vigil, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7548 Russell J. Burke Nevada Bar No. 12710 Kyle A. Ewing Nevada Bar No. 14051 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 /s/ Diana Cline Ebron Diana Cline Ebron Nevada Bar No. 10580 Jacqueline A. Gilbert Nevada Bar No. 10593 Karen L. Hanks Nevada Bar No. 9578 7625 Dean Martin Dr., Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89014 Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC 6 7 8 9 10 (702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070 12 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750 11 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE __________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II Dated: United States District Judge DATED this 11th day of January, 2017. 16 17 18 Respectfully submitted, 19 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /s/ Russell J. Burke Abran E. Vigil, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7548 Russell J. Burke Nevada Bar No. 12710 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 Telephone: (702) 471-7000 Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?