JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 53

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 49 Motion to Serve Rodrigo J. Coloma by Publication and 50 Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve Summons and Cross-Claim are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to effect service of process is extended up to and including 5/5/2017. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4
5

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiffs,

6
7

vs.

8

2:16-cv-02230-RFB-VCF
ORDER GRANTING ENLARGMENT OF
TIME TO SERVE

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1 LLC, et al.,

9

Defendants.

10
11
12

Before the court are the Motion to Serve Rodrigo J. Coloma by Publication and Motion to Enlarge
Time to Serve Summons and Cross-Claim (ECF No. 49 and 50).

13

Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC asks this court to permit service of the Summons

14

and Counter/Cross-Complaint against Cross-Defendant Rodrigo J. Coloma by publication. Id. SFR also

15

seeks to extend the time in which to effectuate service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Id.

16

No opposition has been filed to the motion for extension of time to serve Counter/Cross-Complaint (ECF

17

No. 49).

18

Service By Publication

19

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1), “an individual – other than a minor, an incompetent person, or

20

a person whose waiver had been filed – may be served in a judicial district of the United States by

21

following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state

22

where the district court is located or where service is made.” Under Rule 4(e)(1) of the Nevada Rules of

23

Civil Procedure, “when the person on whom service is to be made resides out of the state, or has departed

24

from the state, or cannot, after due diligence, be found within the state, or by concealment seeks to avoid

25

the service of summons, and the fact shall appear, by affidavit, to the satisfaction of the court or judge

1

thereof, and it shall appear, either by affidavit or by a verified complaint on file, that a cause of action

2

exists against the defendant in respect to whom the service is to be made, and that the defendant is a

3

necessary or proper party to the action, such court or judge may grant an order that the service be made

4

by the publication of summons.”

5

SFR asserts that the after diligent effort, it is unable to serve Coloma within the state of Nevada.

6

(ECF No. 49 at 4). In support of this assertion, SFR provided the court with an affidavit of attempted

7

service. Id. The last known addresses for Coloma is 921 Noah Valley Street, Henderson, Nevada 89052.

8

Id. Service at this address was unsuccessful. Id.

9

The court finds that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1) and Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1), permitting

10

service by publication of the Summons and Counter/Cross-Complaint is warranted. Pursuant to Rule

11

4(e)(1)(iii), the publication must be made in a newspaper, published in the State of Nevada, for a period

12

of 4 weeks, and at least once a week during said time. Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1)(iii).

13

Extension For Service

14

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) requires a defendant to be served within 90 days after the complaint is filed.

15

If “the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure [to serve a defendant within that time-frame], the court

16

must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

17

The last day to effectuate service on Coloma was February 26, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). SFR

18

asserts that an additional 60 days is required to effect service by publication, and asks this court to extend

19

the 4(m) deadline. Id.

20

Given that SFR has demonstrated “good cause” for its failure to effectuate service and has provided

21

support for its request for an extension, the court will extend the 4(m) deadline until May 5, 2017. See

22

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

23

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Serve Rodrigo J. Coloma by Publication and Motion

25

to Enlarge Time to Serve Summons and Cross-Claim (ECF No. 49 and 50) are GRANTED.

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SFR is permitted to serve Coloma by publication. A copy of the

2

Summons and Complaint must be mailed to Coloma at his last known address(es) by certified U.S. Mail,

3

return receipt requested.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1) and Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1)(i)

5

and (iii), the Summons in this action must be served by publication in a newspaper, published in the state

6

of Nevada, for a period of four weeks and at least once a week during that time.

7
8
9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to effect service of process is extended up to and
including May 5, 2017.
DATED this 4th day of April, 2017.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE