Sharda v. Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, et al

Filing 61

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 36 defendants' motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 NAVNEET SHARDA, M.D., 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 Case No. 2:16-CV-2233 JCM (GWF) ORDER v. SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, et al., Defendant(s). 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge Presently before the court is Sharda v. Sunrise Hsopital and Medical Center, LLC et al, case number 2:16-cv-02233-JCM-GWF. On December 30, 2016, defendants’ Board of Trustees of Sunrise Hospital, Katherine Keeley, Susan Reisinger, and Sunrise Hospital Medical Center, LLC filed two motions to dismiss. The motions are identical, except for the fact that the first filing is unsealed and contains redacted language and exhibits, (ECF No. 35), whereas the second filing is sealed and un-redacted, (ECF No. 36). On July 3, 2017, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 35) as to all claims except tortious interference and breach of contract. (ECF No. 58). Therefore, defendants’ second motion to dismiss (ECF No. 36) is moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 36) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. DATED October 3, 2017. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?