Sharda v. Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, et al

Filing 71

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 70 the parties' proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

NAVEET SHARDA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL
)
CENTER, LLC, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:16-cv-02233-JCM-GWF
ORDER

The Court has received the parties’ proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF

14

No. 70). LR 26-1(e)(1) provides that unless otherwise ordered, discovery periods longer than one

15

hundred eighty (180) days from the date the first defendant answers or appears will require special

16

scheduling review. LR 26-1(d) states that if longer deadlines are sought, the plan shall state on its

17

face “SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW REQUESTED.” Where such special scheduling review

18

is requested, the plan shall state the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply.

19
20
21
22
23

Here, the parties’ proposed plan does not comply with LR 26-1(d) nor does it provide the
Court with sufficient information to justify a one year discovery period. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling
Order (ECF No. 70) is denied without prejudice.
DATED this 1st day of March, 2018.

24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge