Sharda v. Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, et al
Filing
71
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 70 the parties' proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NAVEET SHARDA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL
)
CENTER, LLC, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02233-JCM-GWF
ORDER
The Court has received the parties’ proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF
14
No. 70). LR 26-1(e)(1) provides that unless otherwise ordered, discovery periods longer than one
15
hundred eighty (180) days from the date the first defendant answers or appears will require special
16
scheduling review. LR 26-1(d) states that if longer deadlines are sought, the plan shall state on its
17
face “SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW REQUESTED.” Where such special scheduling review
18
is requested, the plan shall state the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply.
19
20
21
22
23
Here, the parties’ proposed plan does not comply with LR 26-1(d) nor does it provide the
Court with sufficient information to justify a one year discovery period. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling
Order (ECF No. 70) is denied without prejudice.
DATED this 1st day of March, 2018.
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?