Williams v. Clark County School District

Filing 26

ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation to Extend Time re 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Responses due by 10/25/2017., Replies due by 11/15/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02248-APG-PAL Document 25 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 2 1 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK Robert P. Spretnak, Esq. (Bar No. 5135) 8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Telephone: (702) 454-4900 Fax: (702) 938-1055 Email: bob @ spretnak.com Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL S. Scott Greenberg, Esq. (Bar No. 4622) 5100 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Telephone: (702) 799-5373 Fax: (702) 799-5505 Email: sgreenberg @ interact.ccsd.net Attorneys for Defendant 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) SHAQUINTA WILLIAMS, Case No.: 2:16-cv-02248-APG-PAL ) ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) vs. TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ) OPPOSITION TO ECF NO. 24 ) CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a (DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ) political subdivision of the State of Nevada, SUMMARY JUDGMENT) ) ) Defendant. (First Request) ) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff SHAQUINTA WILLIAMS and Defendant CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL 20 DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, by and through their respective counsel 21 of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff Shaquinta Williams to file her 22 points and authorities in opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24) 23 by two weeks, to October 25, 2017. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on 24 September 20, 2017; therefore, in accordance with LR 7-2(b), Plaintiff’s response currently is due 25 to be filed by October 11, 2017. 26 27 LAW preparation for a jury trial in the matter of Lisa Hoops v. Robert Roth, MD, A Professional 28 T HE There is good cause for entering into this stipulation. Plaintiff’s counsel is engaged in Corporation, Case No. 2:15-cv-01421-GMN-CWH, set to begin on October 16, 2017. In addition, OFFICES OF R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K A PR O FE SSIO N A L C O R P O R A T IO N 8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E SU IT E 200 LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:16-cv-02248-APG-PAL Document 25 Filed 09/28/17 Page 2 of 2 1 Plaintiff’s counsel has an appellate brief due to be filed on October 10, 2017, with the Ninth Circuit 2 in the matter of Leeann E. Archuleta and Michael B. Dickens v. Corrections Corporation of 3 America, Case No. 17-15553. With these two major deadlines, and additional duties in other 4 matters, a brief extension of two weeks is requested for this dispositive motion. 5 This extension, in turn, will necessitate a one-week extension until November 15, 2017, for 6 Defendant to file its reply brief. Based on the new deadline for the opposition brief to be filed, the 7 deadline for Defendant to file its reply brief to November 8, 2017. This brief extension is necessary 8 because counsel for Defendant is scheduled to be out of town for a period of time during which the 9 reply would need to be prepared and filed. 10 11 DATED: September 28, 2017. DATED: September 28, 2017. 12 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 14 By: /s/ Robert P. Spretnak Robert P. Spretnak, Esq. By: /s/ S. Scott Greenberg S. Scott Greenberg, Esq. 15 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 16 8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 5100 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 13 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 _______________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: September 29, 2017. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T HE LAW OFFICES OF R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K A PR O FE SSIO N A L C O R P O R A T IO N 8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E SU IT E 200 LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?