Williams v. Clark County School District
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation to Extend Time re 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Responses due by 10/25/2017., Replies due by 11/15/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-02248-APG-PAL Document 25 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 2
1
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK
Robert P. Spretnak, Esq. (Bar No. 5135)
8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: (702) 454-4900
Fax: (702) 938-1055
Email: bob @ spretnak.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
S. Scott Greenberg, Esq. (Bar No. 4622)
5100 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Telephone: (702) 799-5373
Fax: (702) 799-5505
Email: sgreenberg @ interact.ccsd.net
Attorneys for Defendant
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
)
SHAQUINTA WILLIAMS,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02248-APG-PAL
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
STIPULATION AND ORDER
)
vs.
TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
)
OPPOSITION TO ECF NO. 24
)
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a
(DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
)
political subdivision of the State of Nevada,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT)
)
)
Defendant.
(First Request)
)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff SHAQUINTA WILLIAMS and Defendant CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL
20
DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, by and through their respective counsel
21
of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff Shaquinta Williams to file her
22
points and authorities in opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24)
23
by two weeks, to October 25, 2017. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on
24
September 20, 2017; therefore, in accordance with LR 7-2(b), Plaintiff’s response currently is due
25
to be filed by October 11, 2017.
26
27
LAW
preparation for a jury trial in the matter of Lisa Hoops v. Robert Roth, MD, A Professional
28
T HE
There is good cause for entering into this stipulation. Plaintiff’s counsel is engaged in
Corporation, Case No. 2:15-cv-01421-GMN-CWH, set to begin on October 16, 2017. In addition,
OFFICES
OF
R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A
PR O FE SSIO N A L
C O R P O R A T IO N
8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:16-cv-02248-APG-PAL Document 25 Filed 09/28/17 Page 2 of 2
1
Plaintiff’s counsel has an appellate brief due to be filed on October 10, 2017, with the Ninth Circuit
2
in the matter of Leeann E. Archuleta and Michael B. Dickens v. Corrections Corporation of
3
America, Case No. 17-15553. With these two major deadlines, and additional duties in other
4
matters, a brief extension of two weeks is requested for this dispositive motion.
5
This extension, in turn, will necessitate a one-week extension until November 15, 2017, for
6
Defendant to file its reply brief. Based on the new deadline for the opposition brief to be filed, the
7
deadline for Defendant to file its reply brief to November 8, 2017. This brief extension is necessary
8
because counsel for Defendant is scheduled to be out of town for a period of time during which the
9
reply would need to be prepared and filed.
10
11
DATED: September 28, 2017.
DATED: September 28, 2017.
12
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
14
By: /s/ Robert P. Spretnak
Robert P. Spretnak, Esq.
By: /s/ S. Scott Greenberg
S. Scott Greenberg, Esq.
15
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
16
8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
5100 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
13
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
_______________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: September 29, 2017.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
T HE
LAW
OFFICES
OF
R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A
PR O FE SSIO N A L
C O R P O R A T IO N
8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?