Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 34

ORDER granting 27 Motion to Strike 25 Response to Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al, ) ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________________ ) 10 Case No. 2:16-cv-02257-JCM-CWH ORDER Presently before the Court is Defendant The Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master 11 Association’s motion to strike (ECF No. 27), filed on January 19, 2017. Counter Claimant SFR 12 Investments Pool 1, LLC filed a response (ECF No. 29) on January 19, 2017. Defendant filed a reply 13 (ECF No. 32) on January 27, 2017. 14 15 Defendant moves this Court to strike SFR’s response (ECF No. 25) to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, arguing that SFR has no standing to submit a response. 16 Under Local Rule 7-2, all written motions before the court must be supported by a 17 memorandum of points and authorities. The failure of a party to file points and authorities in 18 response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, 19 constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. SFR’s response (ECF No. 29) cites no 20 supporting points or authorities, providing no basis for this Court to deny Defendant’s motion. 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to strike (ECF No. 27) is 2 GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall STRIKE SFR’s response (ECF No. 25) to Defendant’s motion 3 to dismiss. 4 DATED: January 30, 2017. 5 6 _________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?