Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
53
ORDER Lifting Stay. 33 Motion Replies due by 6/8/2017., 37 Motion Responses due by 6/22/2017., Replies due 14 days thereafter. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/22/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:16-CV-2257 JCM (CWH)
ORDER
v.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
Presently before the court is the matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool
1, LLC et al., case number 2:16-cv-02257-JCM-CWH.
15
On May 18, 2017, plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and defendant SFR
16
Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) filed a stipulation to stay litigation pending the outcome of
17
mediation between Wells Fargo and former defendant Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master
18
Association (the “HOA”). (ECF No. 49). On May 19, 2017, the magistrate judge granted the
19
stipulation to stay. (ECF No. 51).
20
The HOA, however, is no longer a party to the instant action pursuant to the court’s order
21
dated May 9, 2017 (ECF No. 45), wherein the court dismissed Wells Fargo’s claims against the
22
HOA. Accordingly, the stay is hereby lifted.
23
...
24
...
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
Briefing will proceed as follows: (1) replies to Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss (ECF No.
2
33) are due on or before June 8, 2017; (2) responses to SFR’s motion for summary judgment (ECF
3
No. 37) are due by June 22, 2017, with replies due fourteen (14) days thereafter; and (3) proposed
4
amended discovery plan and scheduling order is due by June 22, 2017.
5
Accordingly,
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED June 1, 2017.
8
9
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?