Bank of America, N.A. v. Aliante Master Association et al

Filing 50

ORDER granting 10 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must submit a bond pursuant to this Order in the amount of $500.00 as to SFR. Failure to do so within thirty days of the filing date of this Order shall constitute grounds for dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
4
5

Plaintiff,
vs.

6
7
8
9

ALIANTE MASTER ASSOCIATION;
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC;
NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES,
INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-02258-GMN-CWH
ORDER

10
11

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Demand for Security of Costs (ECF No.

12

10) filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”). For the reasons set forth

13

below, the Motion is granted.

14

The Ninth Circuit recognizes that “federal district courts have inherent power to

15

require plaintiffs to post security for costs.” Simulnet E. Assocs. v. Ramada Hotel

16

Operating Co., 37 F.3d 573, 574 (9th Cir. 1994). Under Nevada law, “[w]hen a plaintiff

17

in an action resides out of the State, or is a foreign corporation, security for the costs and

18

charges which may be awarded against such plaintiff may be required by the defendant.”

19

NRS § 18.130(1). “After the lapse of 30 days from the service of notice that security is

20

required . . . upon proof thereof, and that no undertaking as required has been filed, the

21

court or judge may order the action to be dismissed.” NRS § 18.130(4). It is the policy of

22

the United States District Court for the District of Nevada to enforce the requirements of

23

NRS § 18.130 in diversity actions. See, e.g., Feagins v. Trump Org., No. 2:11-cv-01121-

24

GMN, 2012 WL 925027, at *1 (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2012).

25

Page 1 of 2

1

Because Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., (“Plaintiff”) resides outside of Nevada,

2

(Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1), the Court finds that it is appropriate to require Plaintiff to post a

3

security bond of $500.00 in this matter pursuant to NRS § 18.130.

4

IV.

5
6
7

CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion Demanding Security of Costs (ECF

No. 10) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must submit a bond pursuant to this

8

Order in the amount of $500.00 as to SFR. Failure to do so within thirty days of the

9

filing date of this Order shall constitute grounds for dismissal.

10

7
DATED this _____ day of April, 2017.

11
12
13
14

__________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2