Nunes et al v. Affinitylifestyles.com, Inc. d/b/a Real Alkalized Water
Filing
19
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Court hereby DENIES 17 the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a new stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than 11/21/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
JENNIFER NUNES, et al.,
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling
13
order. Docket No. 17. The date set forth in the proposed discovery plan regarding expert reports
14
does not follow the format required by the Local Rules. See Docket No. 17 at 3; see also LR 26-
15
1(b)(3). Additionally, the parties disagree as to the deadline for amending the pleadings and adding
16
parties, but do not explain their positions. See Docket No. 17 at 3; see also LR 26-1(a).
7
Plaintiff(s),
8
vs.
9
AFFINITYLIFESTYLES.COM, et al.,
10
Defendant(s).
Case No. 2:16-cv-02265-APG-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 17)
17
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and
18
scheduling order (Docket No. 17). The parties shall file a new stipulated proposed discovery plan
19
and scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than November 21, 2016.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
DATED: November 17, 2016
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?